Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Parameter-Efficient Finetuning of Transformers for Source Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.05901 v1 pith:X3E75QIE submitted 2022-12-12 cs.CL cs.LGcs.SE

classification cs.CLcs.LGcs.SE
keywords fine-tuningtaskscodeapproachesefficientpretrainedachievecode-processing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Pretrained Transformers achieve state-of-the-art performance in various code-processing tasks but may be too large to be deployed. As software development tools often incorporate modules for various purposes which may potentially use a single instance of the pretrained model, it appears relevant to utilize parameter-efficient fine-tuning for the pretrained models of code. In this work, we test two widely used approaches, adapters and LoRA, which were initially tested on NLP tasks, on four code-processing tasks. We find that though the efficient fine-tuning approaches may achieve comparable or higher performance than the standard, full, fine-tuning in code understanding tasks, they underperform full fine-tuning in code-generative tasks. These results underline the importance of testing efficient fine-tuning approaches on other domains than NLP and motivate future research in efficient fine-tuning for source code.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Parameter-Efficient Multi-Task Fine-Tuning in Code-Related Tasks

    cs.SE 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Multi-task QLoRA on Qwen2.5-Coder matches or beats single-task QLoRA and full fine-tuning for code generation and Python summarization, but lags in Java-to-C# translation.

  2. A Systematic Literature Review of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Code Models

    cs.SE 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This review synthesizes 28 studies to classify PEFT use in software engineering, finding LoRA and adapters dominant and PEFT often competitive with full fine-tuning.

  3. Resource-Efficient & Effective Code Summarization

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    QLoRA fine-tuning outperforms full fine-tuning for code summarization on CodeXGLUE while cutting GPU memory by roughly two-thirds.

Pith tools