REVIEW 3 cited by
Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?
read the original abstract
Data annotation is the process of labeling data that could be used to train machine learning models. Having high-quality annotation is crucial, as it allows the model to learn the relationship between the input data and the desired output. GPT-3, a large-scale language model developed by OpenAI, has demonstrated impressive zero- and few-shot performance on a wide range of NLP tasks. It is therefore natural to wonder whether it can be used to effectively annotate data for NLP tasks. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GPT-3 as a data annotator by comparing it with traditional data annotation methods and analyzing its output on a range of tasks. Through this analysis, we aim to provide insight into the potential of GPT-3 as a general-purpose data annotator in NLP.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Dynamic Emotion and Personality Profiling for Multimodal Deception Detection
A new dataset DDEP and reliability-weighted fusion model Rel-DDEP jointly detect deception, emotion, and personality from multimodal data, reporting F1 gains of 2.53%, 2.66%, and 9.30% over baselines.
-
Learning to Select Visual In-Context Demonstrations
A Dueling-DQN agent selects visual in-context demonstrations and outperforms kNN retrieval on objective regression benchmarks but not on subjective preference tasks, per the paper's main table.
-
Online In-Context Distillation for Low-Resource Vision Language Models
Online In-Context Distillation lets small VLMs gain up to 33% performance with as little as 4% teacher annotations by distilling knowledge through dynamic in-context demonstrations at inference.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.