REVIEW 9 cited by
DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Visual language such as charts and plots is ubiquitous in the human world. Comprehending plots and charts requires strong reasoning skills. Prior state-of-the-art (SOTA) models require at least tens of thousands of training examples and their reasoning capabilities are still much limited, especially on complex human-written queries. This paper presents the first one-shot solution to visual language reasoning. We decompose the challenge of visual language reasoning into two steps: (1) plot-to-text translation, and (2) reasoning over the translated text. The key in this method is a modality conversion module, named as DePlot, which translates the image of a plot or chart to a linearized table. The output of DePlot can then be directly used to prompt a pretrained large language model (LLM), exploiting the few-shot reasoning capabilities of LLMs. To obtain DePlot, we standardize the plot-to-table task by establishing unified task formats and metrics, and train DePlot end-to-end on this task. DePlot can then be used off-the-shelf together with LLMs in a plug-and-play fashion. Compared with a SOTA model finetuned on more than >28k data points, DePlot+LLM with just one-shot prompting achieves a 24.0% improvement over finetuned SOTA on human-written queries from the task of chart QA.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
A large-scale benchmark shows that leading multimodal language models still underperform expert humans at verifying climate claims from scientific charts.
-
Mixture of Cognitive Experts in Large Vision-Language Models
Routing CV experts into atomic evidence then Bloom-staged verbalization improves LVLM benchmarks and yields measurable query-conditioned reasoning traces.
-
Visual Programmability: A Guide for Code-as-Thought in Chart Understanding
A vision-language model learns to dynamically switch between code-based and visual reasoning for chart questions, improving average accuracy by about one point over fixed strategies.
-
In-Depth and In-Breadth: Pre-training Multimodal Language Models Customized for Comprehensive Chart Understanding
ChartScope, using a template-based synthetic data pipeline and dual-path reasoning training, outperforms prior chart-reading models on several advanced chart benchmarks.
-
VisualToolAgent (VisTA): A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Visual Tool Selection
VisTA uses GRPO reinforcement learning to train a vision-language agent to select external visual tools for a frozen reasoning model, improving accuracy on ChartQA, Geometry3K, BlindTest, and MathVerse.
-
ChartLens: Fine-grained Visual Attribution in Charts
ChartLens uses segmentation and set-of-marks prompting to attribute chart-based answers to specific visual elements, and the authors release a new benchmark for evaluating such attribution.
-
Chart-to-Experience: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Predicting Experiential Impact of Charts
Multimodal LLMs underperform humans at directly rating charts' experiential impact, but they are substantially better at pairwise comparisons, especially when the human ratings differ clearly.
-
Granite Vision: a lightweight, open-source multimodal model for enterprise Intelligence
Granite Vision is a ~3B parameter open-weights vision-language model that reaches state-of-the-art scores on document understanding benchmarks despite its small size.
-
A Survey of AI for Materials Science: Foundation Models, LLM Agents, Datasets, and Tools
This survey organizes foundation models, LLM agents, datasets, and tools in materials science into six task areas.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.