Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Automated Verilog RTL Code Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.11140 v1 pith:RV2Q3CBO submitted 2022-12-13 cs.PL cs.LGcs.SE

Benchmarking Large Language Models for Automated Verilog RTL Code Generation

classification cs.PL cs.LGcs.SE
keywords verilogcodellmslanguagedesignevaluationfunctionalgithub
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automating hardware design could obviate a significant amount of human error from the engineering process and lead to fewer errors. Verilog is a popular hardware description language to model and design digital systems, thus generating Verilog code is a critical first step. Emerging large language models (LLMs) are able to write high-quality code in other programming languages. In this paper, we characterize the ability of LLMs to generate useful Verilog. For this, we fine-tune pre-trained LLMs on Verilog datasets collected from GitHub and Verilog textbooks. We construct an evaluation framework comprising test-benches for functional analysis and a flow to test the syntax of Verilog code generated in response to problems of varying difficulty. Our findings show that across our problem scenarios, the fine-tuning results in LLMs more capable of producing syntactically correct code (25.9% overall). Further, when analyzing functional correctness, a fine-tuned open-source CodeGen LLM can outperform the state-of-the-art commercial Codex LLM (6.5% overall). Training/evaluation scripts and LLM checkpoints are available: https://github.com/shailja-thakur/VGen.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HarmChip: Evaluating Hardware Security Centric LLM Safety via Jailbreak Benchmarking

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    HarmChip is a new benchmark exposing an alignment paradox where LLMs refuse legitimate hardware security queries but comply with semantically disguised malicious requests.

  2. RefEvo: Agentic Design with Co-Evolutionary Verification for Agile Reference Model Generation

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RefEvo achieves 95% pass rate on 20 hardware modules for SystemC reference model generation using dynamic multi-agent planning, co-evolutionary verification, and spec anchoring, with 71% token reduction.

  3. Configuration Over Selection: Hyperparameter Sensitivity Exceeds Model Differences in Open-Source LLMs for RTL Generation

    cs.AR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hyperparameter configuration in open-source LLMs for RTL generation produces up to 25.5% intra-model pass-rate variation on VerilogEval and RTLLM, exceeding inter-model spreads by 5x with near-zero correlation in opti...