REVIEW 2 cited by
Multiple Mellin-Barnes integrals with straight contours
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We show how the conic hull method, recently developed for the analytic and non-iterative evaluation of multifold Mellin-Barnes (MB) integrals, can be extended to the case where these integrals have straight contours of integration parallel to the imaginary axes in the complex planes of the integration variables. MB integrals of this class appear, for instance, when one computes the $\epsilon$-expansion of dimensionally regularized Feynman integrals, as a result of the application of one of the two main strategies (called A and B in the literature) used to resolve the singularities in $\epsilon$ of MB representations. We upgrade the Mathematica package MBConicHulls.wl which can now be used to obtain multivariable series representations of multifold MB integrals with arbitrary straight contours, providing an efficient tool for the automatic computation of such integrals. This new feature of the package is presented, along with an example of application by calculating the $\epsilon$-expansion of the dimensionally regularized massless one-loop pentagon integral in general kinematics and $D=4-2\epsilon$.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Feynman Diagrams from Conformal Integrals
Any massless-internal Feynman integral is a limit of a conformal integral, letting conformal-family computations supply exact answers for many Feynman diagrams.
-
Multiple Mellin-Barnes integrals in Schwinger-DeWitt technique
Series representations of N-fold Mellin-Barnes integrals for basis and complete kernels of operator functions are obtained in non-resonant and resonant cases and linked to UV/IR asymptotics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.