REVIEW 30 cited by
Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, but the quality bar for medical and clinical applications is high. Today, attempts to assess models' clinical knowledge typically rely on automated evaluations on limited benchmarks. There is no standard to evaluate model predictions and reasoning across a breadth of tasks. To address this, we present MultiMedQA, a benchmark combining six existing open question answering datasets spanning professional medical exams, research, and consumer queries; and HealthSearchQA, a new free-response dataset of medical questions searched online. We propose a framework for human evaluation of model answers along multiple axes including factuality, precision, possible harm, and bias. In addition, we evaluate PaLM (a 540-billion parameter LLM) and its instruction-tuned variant, Flan-PaLM, on MultiMedQA. Using a combination of prompting strategies, Flan-PaLM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on every MultiMedQA multiple-choice dataset (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, MMLU clinical topics), including 67.6% accuracy on MedQA (US Medical License Exam questions), surpassing prior state-of-the-art by over 17%. However, human evaluation reveals key gaps in Flan-PaLM responses. To resolve this we introduce instruction prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient approach for aligning LLMs to new domains using a few exemplars. The resulting model, Med-PaLM, performs encouragingly, but remains inferior to clinicians. We show that comprehension, recall of knowledge, and medical reasoning improve with model scale and instruction prompt tuning, suggesting the potential utility of LLMs in medicine. Our human evaluations reveal important limitations of today's models, reinforcing the importance of both evaluation frameworks and method development in creating safe, helpful LLM models for clinical applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 30 Pith papers
-
LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data
LLMs exhibit epistemically vacuous confidence on clinical tabular data, but cross-model attribution divergence with XGBoost enables a calibrator that reduces expected calibration error from 0.254 to 0.080.
-
MeMo: Memory as a Model
MeMo encodes new knowledge into a separate memory model for frozen LLMs, achieving strong performance on BrowseComp-Plus, NarrativeQA, and MuSiQue while capturing cross-document relationships and remaining robust to r...
-
Why Supervised Fine-Tuning Fails to Learn: A Systematic Study of Incomplete Learning in Large Language Models
Supervised fine-tuning of LLMs often fails to fully internalize all training instances due to five recurring causes including missing prerequisites and data conflicts, as diagnosed via a new framework across multiple models.
-
Vision-Language Foundation Models for Comprehensive Automated Pavement Condition Assessment
Instruction-tuned vision-language model PaveGPT, trained on a large unified pavement dataset, achieves substantial gains over general models in comprehensive, standard-compliant pavement condition assessment.
-
Language Model Beats Diffusion -- Tokenizer is Key to Visual Generation
A new shared video-image tokenizer enables large language models to surpass diffusion models on standard visual generation benchmarks.
-
Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems
GPT-4 exceeds the USMLE passing score by more than 20 points and outperforms both GPT-3.5 and the medically fine-tuned Med-PaLM on the MultiMedQA benchmarks.
-
MedRealMM: A Real-World Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Online Medical Consultation
A real multimodal Chinese online-consultation benchmark of 5,620 cases finds frontier LLMs below physicians, with safety-sensitive error avoidance as the main gap.
-
MyoCardBench: A Real-World Data Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinically Authentic Cardiovascular Care Scenarios
MyoCardBench, a 13-task real-world cardiology benchmark, shows GPT-5.4 leading seven LLMs while ECG reading and clinical ethics remain near-random.
-
PertReason: A Knowledge-Grounded Benchmark and Framework for Cell-State-Conditioned Mechanistic Reasoning of Perturbation Effects
PertReasonQA scores AI models on cell-state-conditioned mechanistic reasoning about perturbation effects, and PertReasonLM, trained with reasoning supervision, reaches 0.736 balanced accuracy and 0.976 edge recall ver...
-
MedRealMM: A Real-World Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Online Medical Consultation
On a new benchmark of 5,620 real multimodal online consultations, top LLMs trail the original physicians mainly because they trigger more unsafe or unsupported negative criteria.
-
Clinically Structured Rank-Gated LoRA for Cross-Benchmark Medical Question Answering
BiRG-LoRA achieves 69.31% macro-average accuracy across CMB, CMExam, MedQA and MedMCQA using a rank-gated LoRA with biaxial clinical gating, outperforming MoELoRA by 0.89 points with 28.1% fewer parameters.
-
Clinically Structured Rank-Gated LoRA for Cross-Benchmark Medical Question Answering
BiRG-LoRA reaches 69.31% macro-average accuracy across CMB, CMExam, MedQA and MedMCQA, outperforming MoELoRA by 0.89 points with 28.1% fewer parameters under a matched single-seed protocol.
-
Atomic Fact-Checking Increases Clinician Trust in Large Language Model Recommendations for Oncology Decision Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Atomic fact-checking of LLM oncology recommendations increased clinician trust from 26.9% to 66.5% (Cohen's d=0.94) in a trial of 356 doctors.
-
Compared to What? Baselines and Metrics for Counterfactual Prompting
Counterfactual prompting effects on LLMs are often indistinguishable from those caused by meaning-preserving paraphrases, causing most previously reported demographic sensitivities to disappear under proper statistica...
-
CareTransition-Audit: A Benchmark to Audit Discharge Summaries for Efficient Care Transitions
A clinician-validated 46-item checklist and zero-shot LLM baselines audit discharge-summary completeness on 50 MIMIC-IV notes, with best models reaching only moderate agreement (κ≈0.5).
-
CausalFlip: A Benchmark for LLM Causal Judgment Beyond Semantic Matching
A new benchmark and training strategy show LLMs trained to internalize causal reasoning steps are less fooled by semantically similar, label-flipped questions than models using explicit chain-of-thought.
-
Towards an AI co-scientist
A multi-agent AI system generates novel biomedical hypotheses that show promising experimental validation in drug repurposing for leukemia, new targets for liver fibrosis, and a bacterial gene transfer mechanism.
-
RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval
RAPTOR introduces a tree-organized retrieval method using recursive abstractive summaries, achieving a 20% absolute accuracy improvement on the QuALITY benchmark when paired with GPT-4.
-
PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering
PMC-VQA dataset and MedVInT model achieve better generative performance on medical VQA benchmarks by visual instruction tuning on a newly constructed large-scale dataset.
-
Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Models
Med-PaLM 2 achieves 86.5% accuracy on MedQA and approaches or exceeds prior state-of-the-art on other medical QA benchmarks while receiving higher physician preference ratings than human answers on consumer questions.
-
BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance
BloombergGPT is a 50B parameter LLM trained on a 708B token mixed financial and general dataset that outperforms prior models on financial benchmarks while preserving general LLM performance.
-
The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuning
The Flan Collection demonstrates that task balancing, data enrichment, and mixed prompt training are critical to effective instruction tuning, yielding stronger Flan-T5 models released publicly.
-
Clinically Structured Rank-Gated LoRA for Cross-Benchmark Medical Question Answering
BiRG-LoRA achieves 69.31% macro-average accuracy across CMB, CMExam, MedQA, and MedMCQA, outperforming MoELoRA by 0.89 points with 28.1% fewer trainable parameters under a matched Qwen3-8B protocol.
-
TriageRA-CCF: Source-Side Clinical Confidence and Coverage Signals for Adaptive Rank Budgeting in Medical LLMs
TriageRA-CCF combines source-side confidence, coverage, and counterfactual signals to supervise an adaptive LoRA rank router, reporting modest average accuracy gains over LoRA/DoRA/MoELoRA baselines on two 8B models u...
-
A French OSCE Dialogue Dataset and Controllable Virtual Patient System for Clinical Training
Introduces a French OSCE dialogue dataset of 240 interactions and a modular LLM-based controllable virtual patient generation system with multi-level LLM-as-Judge evaluation for clinical skills training.
-
MeMo: Memory as a Model
MeMo encodes new knowledge into a separate memory model that integrates with frozen LLMs, showing strong performance on QA benchmarks while avoiding catastrophic forgetting and working without access to model weights.
-
CareTransition-Audit: A Benchmark to Audit Discharge Summaries for Efficient Care Transitions
An LLM-based framework automates auditing of discharge summaries using a DISCHARGED-derived checklist on MIMIC-IV data to detect missing or ambiguous documentation elements.
-
MedGemma vs GPT-4: Open-Source and Proprietary Zero-shot Medical Disease Classification from Images
Fine-tuned MedGemma outperforms untuned GPT-4 in zero-shot medical image disease classification, achieving 80.37% versus 69.58% mean test accuracy with higher sensitivity for cancer and pneumonia.
-
Large Language Models: A Survey
The paper surveys key large language models, their training methods, datasets, evaluation benchmarks, and future research directions in the field.
-
Data-Centric Foundation Models in Computational Healthcare: A Survey
The paper surveys data-centric strategies for foundation models in computational healthcare and supplies a curated list of related models and datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.