REVIEW 2 cited by
The Hubble Rate Trouble: An Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The Hubble constant inferred from the 6-parameter fit to the CMB power spectrum conflicts with the value obtained from direct measurements via type Ia supernova and Cepheids observations. We write down effective operators involving spin-0, spin-1/2, and spin-1 dark matter that lead to the relativistic production of dark matter particles at early times, and consequently lead to an increase in the number of relativistic degrees of freedom. This mechanism which is amenable to CMB, BBN, and structure formation observables can sufficiently raise the value of the Hubble constant derived from CMB and reconcile local and CMB probes of the Hubble constant. This mechanism alone increases $H_0$ up to $70\, {\rm km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$, and with the help of a Phantom-like cosmology, reach $H_0 \simeq 71-73\, {\rm km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$. Lastly, we outline the region of parameter space which reproduces $H_0 \simeq 71-73\, {\rm km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$ while obeying all relevant constraints.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Interpreting the Hubble tension with a cascade decaying dark matter sector
A cascade decaying dark matter model combining early and late effects still cannot reduce the Hubble tension below about 3 sigma, and is statistically disfavored relative to Lambda CDM.
-
Updated BBN Bounds on Hadronic Injection in the Early Universe: The Gravitino Problem
With current light-element abundances, hadronic decays of long-lived particles are excluded above a yield curve in lifetime, and for gravitinos this translates into reheating temperature upper limits as low as 5×10^5 GeV.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.