Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.04655 v1 pith:OQR2ND54 submitted 2023-01-11 cs.LG cs.AI

ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords liketextsmodelgenerativemodelsimageschatgptbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

During the last two years there has been a plethora of large generative models such as ChatGPT or Stable Diffusion that have been published. Concretely, these models are able to perform tasks such as being a general question and answering system or automatically creating artistic images that are revolutionizing several sectors. Consequently, the implications that these generative models have in the industry and society are enormous, as several job positions may be transformed. For example, Generative AI is capable of transforming effectively and creatively texts to images, like the DALLE-2 model; text to 3D images, like the Dreamfusion model; images to text, like the Flamingo model; texts to video, like the Phenaki model; texts to audio, like the AudioLM model; texts to other texts, like ChatGPT; texts to code, like the Codex model; texts to scientific texts, like the Galactica model or even create algorithms like AlphaTensor. This work consists on an attempt to describe in a concise way the main models are sectors that are affected by generative AI and to provide a taxonomy of the main generative models published recently.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When LLMs Invent Rust Crates: An Empirical Study of Hallucination Patterns and Mitigation

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    First empirical study shows crate hallucination in Rust LLMs has consistent rates across models insensitive to parameters and tests prompt-based mitigation.

  2. Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Tasks

    cs.CV 2024-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Grounded SAM integrates Grounding DINO and SAM to support text-prompted open-world detection and segmentation, achieving 48.7 mean AP on SegInW zero-shot with the base detector and huge segmenter.

  3. ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language models

    cs.CL 2023-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ART automatically generates multi-step reasoning programs with tool integration for LLMs, yielding substantial gains over few-shot and auto-CoT prompting on BigBench and MMLU while matching hand-crafted CoT on most tasks.

  4. From Prompts to Context: An Ontology-Driven Framework for Human-Generative AI Collaboration

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Presents the CCAI ontology and SPARQL retrieval method to convert ephemeral Human-Generative AI prompt interactions into explicit, machine-readable collaboration traces, illustrated in a competency-profile software ca...

  5. CodePori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology

    cs.SE 2024-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    CodePori is a multi-agent LLM system for code generation whose participant evaluation identifies practical challenges like memory limits and hallucinations missed by binary benchmarks.

  6. AI-Powered Sustainable Finance: An Integrative Taxonomy and Framework of AI Applications for Sustainable Investment Decision-Making

    cs.CE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review paper that builds a taxonomy of AI methods (supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement learning, NLP, optimization) and a framework for their use in ESG score prediction, controversy detection, portfolio managem...

  7. Creating and Evaluating K-12 GenAI Assessment Graders Through Context Engineering

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    LLM graders achieve substantial human agreement on math and science MCAS items but vary on ELA, performing best as sources of formative narrative feedback rather than summative numerical scores.

  8. Enhancing Instructional Quality: Leveraging Computer-Assisted Textual Analysis to Generate In-Depth Insights from Educational Artifacts

    cs.AI 2024-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AI and NLP applied to educational artifacts within the Instructional Core Framework can identify advantages for teacher coaching, student support, and personalized learning.