Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Probing lens-induced gravitational-wave birefringence as a test of general relativity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.04826 v1 pith:KMRFYK5M submitted 2023-01-12 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

Probing lens-induced gravitational-wave birefringence as a test of general relativity

classification gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords delaytimeaccountingbirefringenceconstraintsevidencefindgeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Theories beyond general relativity (GR) modify the propagation of gravitational waves (GWs). In some, inhomogeneities (aka. gravitational lenses) allow interactions between the metric and additional fields to cause lens-induced birefringence (LIB): a different speed of the two linear GW polarisations ($+$ and $\times$). Inhomogeneities then act as non-isotropic crystals, splitting the GW signal into two components whose relative time delay depends on the theory and lens parameters. Here we study the observational prospects for GW scrambling, i.e when the time delay between both GW polarisations is smaller than the signal's duration and the waveform recorded by a detector is distorted. We analyze the latest LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA catalog, GWTC-3, and find no conclusive evidence for LIB. The highest log Bayes factor that we find in favour of LIB is $3.21$ for GW$190521$, a particularly loud but short event. However, when accounting for false alarms due to (Gaussian) noise fluctuations, this evidence is below 1-$\sigma$. The tightest constraint on the time delay is $<0.51$ ms (90% C.L.) from GW$200311\_115853$. From the non-observation of GW scrambling, we constrain the optical depth for LIB, accounting for the chance of randomly distributed lenses (eg. galaxies) along the line of sight. Our LIB constraints on a (quartic) scalar-tensor Horndeski theory are more stringent than solar system tests for a wide parameter range and comparable to GW170817 in some limits. Interpreting GW190521 as an AGN binary (i.e. taking an AGN flare as a counterpart) allows even more stringent constraints. Our results demonstrate the potential and high sensitivity achievable by tests of GR, based on GW lensing.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for strong lensing of gravitational waves in the binary black hole events from O1-O4a

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Posterior Overlap 2.0 finds no lensed BBH pairs in O1–O4a (p_L < 0.6% for all pairs) and sets a 90% upper bound of 1.4% on the strong-lensing fraction.

  2. Parameter inference of millilensed gravitational waves using neural spline flows

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Neural spline flows perform fast posterior inference on 11-dimensional millilensed GW parameters with accuracy comparable to dynesty for most quantities and a 3-day to 0.8-second speedup.