REVIEW 2 cited by
StockEmotions: Discover Investor Emotions for Financial Sentiment Analysis and Multivariate Time Series
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
There has been growing interest in applying NLP techniques in the financial domain, however, resources are extremely limited. This paper introduces StockEmotions, a new dataset for detecting emotions in the stock market that consists of 10,000 English comments collected from StockTwits, a financial social media platform. Inspired by behavioral finance, it proposes 12 fine-grained emotion classes that span the roller coaster of investor emotion. Unlike existing financial sentiment datasets, StockEmotions presents granular features such as investor sentiment classes, fine-grained emotions, emojis, and time series data. To demonstrate the usability of the dataset, we perform a dataset analysis and conduct experimental downstream tasks. For financial sentiment/emotion classification tasks, DistilBERT outperforms other baselines, and for multivariate time series forecasting, a Temporal Attention LSTM model combining price index, text, and emotion features achieves the best performance than using a single feature.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
Ethical rules for financial digital phenotyping can be written as deontic temporal constraints whose violations Z3 proves unsatisfiable inside the formal model.
-
Towards Temporal Knowledge-Base Creation for Fine-Grained Opinion Analysis with Language Models
A DSPy-based LLM annotation pipeline creates a temporal fine-grained opinion knowledge base from StockTwits and Politifact text, with best F1 scores of 45.91 to 59.92 on source benchmark tests.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.