Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding INT4 Quantization for Transformer Models: Latency Speedup, Composability, and Failure Cases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12017 v2 pith:ACTTRRPG submitted 2023-01-27 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelsquantizationint4w4a4accuracylatencytimesbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Improving the deployment efficiency of transformer-based language models has been challenging given their high computation and memory cost. While INT8 quantization has recently been shown to be effective in reducing both the memory cost and latency while preserving model accuracy, it remains unclear whether we can leverage INT4 (which doubles peak hardware throughput) to achieve further latency improvement. In this study, we explore the feasibility of employing INT4 weight and activation (W4A4) quantization for language models. Our findings indicate that W4A4 quantization introduces no to negligible accuracy degradation for encoder-only and encoder-decoder models, but causes a significant accuracy drop for decoder-only models. To materialize the performance gain using W4A4, we develop a highly optimized end-to-end W4A4 encoder inference pipeline supporting different quantization strategies. Our INT4 pipeline is $8.5\times$ faster for latency-oriented scenarios and up to $3\times$ for throughput-oriented scenarios compared to the inference of FP16, and improves the SOTA BERT INT8 performance from FasterTransformer by up to $1.7\times$. We provide insights into the failure cases when applying W4A4 to decoder-only models, and further explore the compatibility of INT4 quantization with other compression methods, like pruning and layer reduction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JuZhou 1.0 Technical Report: The First Edge-Native Text-to-Image Foundation Model Trained Entirely on China-Developed AI Accelerators

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    JuZhou 1.0 is a 0.387B-parameter T2I diffusion model with 4-step inference achieving 0.69 GenEval, trained on 9M Chinese pairs using Sugon K100 accelerators and deployable on Android/iOS devices.

  2. Quaff: Quantized Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning under Outlier Spatial Stability Hypothesis

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quaff shows that activation outlier channels keep their spatial positions during LLM fine-tuning, and exploits this stability to cut fine-tuning memory and latency with INT8 quantization while matching or beating full...

Pith tools