Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communication

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.03460 v3 pith:NNJHYEVY submitted 2023-02-07 cs.CY cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.LG
keywords artificialintelligenceexplainablehumanchallengescommunicationexplainersinsights
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past decade explainable artificial intelligence has evolved from a predominantly technical discipline into a field that is deeply intertwined with social sciences. Insights such as human preference for contrastive -- more precisely, counterfactual -- explanations have played a major role in this transition, inspiring and guiding the research in computer science. Other observations, while equally important, have nevertheless received much less consideration. The desire of human explainees to communicate with artificial intelligence explainers through a dialogue-like interaction has been mostly neglected by the community. This poses many challenges for the effectiveness and widespread adoption of such technologies as delivering a single explanation optimised according to some predefined objectives may fail to engender understanding in its recipients and satisfy their unique needs given the diversity of human knowledge and intention. Using insights elaborated by Niklas Luhmann and, more recently, Elena Esposito we apply social systems theory to highlight challenges in explainable artificial intelligence and offer a path forward, striving to reinvigorate the technical research in the direction of interactive and iterative explainers. Specifically, this paper demonstrates the potential of systems theoretical approaches to communication in elucidating and addressing the problems and limitations of human-centred explainable artificial intelligence.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymmetric Communication: Large Language Models and Language Games

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Human–LLM exchange is asymmetric communication: model outputs circulate without commitments, so AGI, hallucination, agency, sentience, and alignment are receiver-side category mistakes, and alignment is institutional ...

  2. From Attribution to Action: A Human-Centered Application of Activation Steering

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Activation steering paired with attribution enables intervention-based debugging in vision models, as all 8 interviewed experts shifted to hypothesis testing, most trusted observed responses, and highlighted risks lik...

  3. Artificial Intelligence Should Genuinely Support Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making To Bridge the Translational Gap

    cs.HC 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Perspective arguing that clinical AI should be reframed as cognitive and epistemic support for clinicians, not as autonomous predictors.

Pith tools