Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Profiling Cold New Early Dark Energy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.07934 v1 pith:RSOZLRAU submitted 2023-02-15 astro-ph.CO hep-phhep-th

Profiling Cold New Early Dark Energy

classification astro-ph.CO hep-phhep-th
keywords nedeconstraintsenergymodeltextdarkearlymathrm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent interest in New Early Dark Energy (NEDE), a cosmological model with a vacuum energy component decaying in a triggered phase transition around recombination, has been sparked by its impact on the Hubble tension. Previous constraints on the model parameters were derived in a Bayesian framework with Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. In this work, we instead perform a frequentist analysis using the profile likelihood in order to assess the impact of prior volume effects on the constraints. We constrain the maximal fraction of NEDE $f_\mathrm{NEDE}$, finding $f_\mathrm{NEDE}=0.076^{+0.040}_{-0.035}$ at $68 \%$ CL with our baseline dataset and similar constraints using either data from SPT-3G, ACT or full-shape large-scale structure, showing a preference over $\Lambda$CDM even in the absence of a SH0ES prior on $H_0$. While this is stronger evidence for NEDE than obtained with the corresponding Bayesian analysis, our constraints broadly match those obtained by fixing the NEDE trigger mass. Including the SH0ES prior on $H_0$, we obtain $f_\mathrm{NEDE}=0.136^{+0.024}_{-0.026}$ at $68 \%$ CL. Furthermore, we compare NEDE with the Early Dark Energy (EDE) model, finding similar constraints on the maximal energy density fractions and $H_0$ in the two models. At $68 \%$ CL in the NEDE model, we find $H_0 = 69.56^{+1.16}_{-1.29} \text{ km s}^{-1}\text{ Mpc}^{-1}$ with our baseline and $H_0 = 71.62^{+0.78}_{-0.76} \text{ km s}^{-1}\text{ Mpc}^{-1}$ when including the SH0ES measurement of $H_0$, thus corroborating previous conclusions that the NEDE model provides a considerable alleviation of the $H_0$ tension.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unifying Early and Late Dark Energy: Dynamical Requirements and Obstructions

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Any unified early and late dark energy scenario with a single tracking scalar field requires a potential with three distinct slopes arranged in a steep-steeper-shallow hierarchy.

  2. The End of the First Act: Spectral Running, Interacting Dark Radiation, and the Hubble Tension in Light of ACT DR6 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Including spectral running α_s, β_s and self-interacting dark radiation relaxes the ACT DR6 bound on ΔN_eff to <0.58 and lowers the Hubble tension to 2.2σ with three extra parameters.

  3. The Hubble tension: A decade review

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 3.0

    Pure early or late fixes to the Hubble tension are tightly constrained; remaining options are combined early-late interacting dark energy or new physics at the local-to-homogeneous transition.

  4. The Hubble tension: A decade review

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review summarizing the Hubble tension as a persistent crisis and discussing resolutions via interacting dark energy models that combine early-time and late-time modifications.