REVIEW 2 cited by
A Review of Attacks Against Language-Based Package Managers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The liberalization of software licensing has led to unprecedented re-use of software. Alongside drastically increasing productivity and arguably quality of derivative works, it has also introduced multiple attack vectors. The management of software intended for re-use is typically conducted by a package manager, whose role involves installing and updating packages and enabling reproducible environments. Package managers implement various measures to enforce the integrity and accurate resolution of packages to prevent supply chain attacks. This review explores supply chain attacks on package managers. The attacks are categorized based on the nature of their impact and their position in the package installation process. To conclude, further areas of research are presented.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Package Managers \`a la Carte: A Formal Model of Dependency Resolution
A core calculus for dependency resolution is proposed with reductions from package-manager extensions, aiming to enable cross-ecosystem dependency translation.
-
Solving Package Management via Hypergraph Dependency Resolution
A hypergraph formalism with three edge types encodes package dependencies, conflicts, and optional deps, and a SAT-based solve can in principle span many package ecosystems in one pass.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.