Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Benchmarking Deepart Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.14475 v1 pith:OSF3ISBY submitted 2023-02-28 cs.CV cs.LG

Benchmarking Deepart Detection

classification cs.CV cs.LG
keywords deepartdeepfakedetectionbenchmarkbeenconstructeddatabasedataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deepfake technologies have been blurring the boundaries between the real and unreal, likely resulting in malicious events. By leveraging newly emerged deepfake technologies, deepfake researchers have been making a great upending to create deepfake artworks (deeparts), which are further closing the gap between reality and fantasy. To address potentially appeared ethics questions, this paper establishes a deepart detection database (DDDB) that consists of a set of high-quality conventional art images (conarts) and five sets of deepart images generated by five state-of-the-art deepfake models. This database enables us to explore once-for-all deepart detection and continual deepart detection. For the two new problems, we suggest four benchmark evaluations and four families of solutions on the constructed DDDB. The comprehensive study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed solutions on the established benchmark dataset, which is capable of paving a way to more interesting directions of deepart detection. The constructed benchmark dataset and the source code will be made publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SciFigDetect: A Benchmark for AI-Generated Scientific Figure Detection

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The first benchmark for AI-generated scientific figure detection shows existing detectors fail in zero-shot transfer, overfit to specific generators, and break under common image corruptions.

  2. TextFake: Benchmarking AI-Generated Image Detection on Text-Rich Images

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TextFake benchmark shows no AI-generated image detector exceeds 80% accuracy on text-rich images and identifies three failure modes including text density and rendering fidelity issues.