REVIEW 2 cited by
The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Texts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has resulted in the production of LLM-generated texts that is highly sophisticated and almost indistinguishable from texts written by humans. However, this has also sparked concerns about the potential misuse of such texts, such as spreading misinformation and causing disruptions in the education system. Although many detection approaches have been proposed, a comprehensive understanding of the achievements and challenges is still lacking. This survey aims to provide an overview of existing LLM-generated text detection techniques and enhance the control and regulation of language generation models. Furthermore, we emphasize crucial considerations for future research, including the development of comprehensive evaluation metrics and the threat posed by open-source LLMs, to drive progress in the area of LLM-generated text detection.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Practical Examination of AI-Generated Text Detectors for Large Language Models
Under a 1% false-positive budget, seven AI-text detectors miss most machine-written text on unseen tasks and languages, and rewriting human text further evades them.
-
Can Large Language Models Effectively Process and Execute Financial Trading Instructions?
On a 500-item trading instruction dataset, five LLMs produced well-formatted JSON most of the time but achieved only 5-10% full accuracy and frequently asked unnecessary follow-up questions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.