Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Calibration of Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.10761 v1 pith:IVZIJ6W4 submitted 2023-03-19 cs.NE cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML

Calibration of Neural Networks

classification cs.NE cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords calibrationconfidencenetworksneuraldifferentempiricalmethodsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Neural networks solving real-world problems are often required not only to make accurate predictions but also to provide a confidence level in the forecast. The calibration of a model indicates how close the estimated confidence is to the true probability. This paper presents a survey of confidence calibration problems in the context of neural networks and provides an empirical comparison of calibration methods. We analyze problem statement, calibration definitions, and different approaches to evaluation: visualizations and scalar measures that estimate whether the model is well-calibrated. We review modern calibration techniques: based on post-processing or requiring changes in training. Empirical experiments cover various datasets and models, comparing calibration methods according to different criteria.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LiST: Lipschitz Scaling Training for Robust and Calibrated Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    There exists a non-trivial Lipschitz constant L* that makes a network intrinsically calibrated; LiST finds it automatically via temperature feedback and produces calibrated robust models on CIFAR and Tiny-ImageNet.

  2. Enhancing Confidence Estimation in Telco LLMs via Twin-Pass CoT-Ensembling

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Twin-Pass Chain-of-Thought Ensembling cuts Expected Calibration Error by up to 88% in Gemma-3 models on TeleQnA, ORANBench, and srsRANBench.

  3. When to Answer and When to Defer: A Decision Framework for Reliable Code Predictions

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces a unified framework integrating uncertainty estimation, calibration, and tool-based abstention for reliable code predictions in language models.