Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CIFAKE: Image Classification and Explainable Identification of AI-Generated Synthetic Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14126 v1 pith:XIWZKRPC submitted 2023-03-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords imagesclassificationdatasetdatageneratedrealsyntheticai-generated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent technological advances in synthetic data have enabled the generation of images with such high quality that human beings cannot tell the difference between real-life photographs and Artificial Intelligence (AI) generated images. Given the critical necessity of data reliability and authentication, this article proposes to enhance our ability to recognise AI-generated images through computer vision. Initially, a synthetic dataset is generated that mirrors the ten classes of the already available CIFAR-10 dataset with latent diffusion which provides a contrasting set of images for comparison to real photographs. The model is capable of generating complex visual attributes, such as photorealistic reflections in water. The two sets of data present as a binary classification problem with regard to whether the photograph is real or generated by AI. This study then proposes the use of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to classify the images into two categories; Real or Fake. Following hyperparameter tuning and the training of 36 individual network topologies, the optimal approach could correctly classify the images with 92.98% accuracy. Finally, this study implements explainable AI via Gradient Class Activation Mapping to explore which features within the images are useful for classification. Interpretation reveals interesting concepts within the image, in particular, noting that the actual entity itself does not hold useful information for classification; instead, the model focuses on small visual imperfections in the background of the images. The complete dataset engineered for this study, referred to as the CIFAKE dataset, is made publicly available to the research community for future work.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Reliability of Vision-Language Models Under Adversarial Frequency-Domain Perturbations

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Vision-language model judgments about image realism and generated captions can be shifted by imperceptible perturbations confined to specific spatial frequency bands, even under black-box access.

  2. DFBench: Benchmarking Deepfake Image Detection Capability of Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DFBench adds a 540,000-image benchmark with 12 modern generators, partial edits, and distorted real images, and its three-model LMM ensemble, MoA-DF, reaches near-perfect recall on its own test split.

Pith tools