Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Contrastive Learning Is Spectral Clustering On Similarity Graph

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.15103 v4 pith:4TNURL4F submitted 2023-03-27 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords learningcontrastiveclusteringgraphkernelkernel-infoncelosssimilarity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Contrastive learning is a powerful self-supervised learning method, but we have a limited theoretical understanding of how it works and why it works. In this paper, we prove that contrastive learning with the standard InfoNCE loss is equivalent to spectral clustering on the similarity graph. Using this equivalence as the building block, we extend our analysis to the CLIP model and rigorously characterize how similar multi-modal objects are embedded together. Motivated by our theoretical insights, we introduce the Kernel-InfoNCE loss, incorporating mixtures of kernel functions that outperform the standard Gaussian kernel on several vision datasets. The code is available at https://github.com/yifanzhang-pro/Kernel-InfoNCE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Existing LLMs Are Not Self-Consistent For Simple Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Even state-of-the-art LLMs produce internally contradictory answers on simple ordering and kinship tasks, and a new inconsistency metric quantifies how far they fall short.

Pith tools