REVIEW 1 cited by
Contrastive Learning Is Spectral Clustering On Similarity Graph
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Contrastive learning is a powerful self-supervised learning method, but we have a limited theoretical understanding of how it works and why it works. In this paper, we prove that contrastive learning with the standard InfoNCE loss is equivalent to spectral clustering on the similarity graph. Using this equivalence as the building block, we extend our analysis to the CLIP model and rigorously characterize how similar multi-modal objects are embedded together. Motivated by our theoretical insights, we introduce the Kernel-InfoNCE loss, incorporating mixtures of kernel functions that outperform the standard Gaussian kernel on several vision datasets. The code is available at https://github.com/yifanzhang-pro/Kernel-InfoNCE.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Existing LLMs Are Not Self-Consistent For Simple Tasks
Even state-of-the-art LLMs produce internally contradictory answers on simple ordering and kinship tasks, and a new inconsistency metric quantifies how far they fall short.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.