Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ARNOLD: A Benchmark for Language-Grounded Task Learning With Continuous States in Realistic 3D Scenes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.04321 v2 pith:SRP5VTLZ submitted 2023-04-09 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CVcs.RO
keywords learningstatestaskcontinuousarnoldchallengesgeneralizationslanguage-conditioned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding the continuous states of objects is essential for task learning and planning in the real world. However, most existing task learning benchmarks assume discrete (e.g., binary) object goal states, which poses challenges for the learning of complex tasks and transferring learned policy from simulated environments to the real world. Furthermore, state discretization limits a robot's ability to follow human instructions based on the grounding of actions and states. To tackle these challenges, we present ARNOLD, a benchmark that evaluates language-grounded task learning with continuous states in realistic 3D scenes. ARNOLD is comprised of 8 language-conditioned tasks that involve understanding object states and learning policies for continuous goals. To promote language-instructed learning, we provide expert demonstrations with template-generated language descriptions. We assess task performance by utilizing the latest language-conditioned policy learning models. Our results indicate that current models for language-conditioned manipulations continue to experience significant challenges in novel goal-state generalizations, scene generalizations, and object generalizations. These findings highlight the need to develop new algorithms that address this gap and underscore the potential for further research in this area. Project website: https://arnold-benchmark.github.io.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Chain Of Interaction Benchmark (COIN): When Reasoning meets Embodied Interaction

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    COIN provides 50 interactive robotic tasks, a 1000-demonstration dataset collected via AR teleoperation, and metrics showing that CodeAsPolicy, VLA, and H-VLA models fail at causally-dependent interactive reasoning du...

  2. A Practical Recipe Towards Improving Sim-and-Real Correlation for VLA Evaluation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Authors perform a cross-simulator, cross-policy empirical study of sim-to-real correlation for VLA policies and distill guidance on using simulation for policy improvement.

  3. World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces World Action Models as a new paradigm unifying predictive world modeling with action generation in embodied foundation models and provides a taxonomy of existing approaches.

  4. Data Pyramid for Embodied Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Embodied training data form a five-layer pyramid—real-robot, UMI, ego/exo, simulation, general V–L—ordered by the trade-off between scale and robot alignment, and model capabilities track how those layers are mixed.

Pith tools