Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Bayesian Optimization of Catalysis With In-Context Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.05341 v2 pith:LW7HEY5X submitted 2023-04-11 physics.chem-ph cs.LG

Bayesian Optimization of Catalysis With In-Context Learning

classification physics.chem-ph cs.LG
keywords languagematerialsbo-iclcatalysisdiscoverybayesiancandidatesgaussian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can perform accurate classification with zero or few examples through in-context learning. We extend this capability to regression with uncertainty estimation using frozen LLMs (e.g., GPT-3.5, Gemini), enabling Bayesian optimization (BO) in natural language without explicit model training or feature engineering. We apply this to materials discovery by representing experimental catalyst synthesis and testing procedures as natural language prompts. A key challenge in materials discovery is the need to characterize suboptimal candidates, which slows progress. While BO is effective for navigating large design spaces, standard surrogate models like Gaussian processes assume smoothness and continuity, an assumption that fails in highly non-linear domains such as heterogeneous catalysis. Our task-agnostic BO workflow overcomes this by operating directly in language space, producing interpretable and actionable predictions without requiring structural or electronic descriptors. On benchmarks like aqueous solubility and oxidative coupling of methane (OCM), BO-ICL matches or outperforms Gaussian processes. In live experiments on the reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reaction, BO-ICL identifies near-optimal multi-metallic catalysts within six iterations from a pool of 3,700 candidates. Our method redefines materials representation and accelerates discovery, with broad applications across catalysis, materials science, and AI. Code: https://github.com/ur-whitelab/BO-ICL.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GRIMIP: A General Framework for Instance-Specific Configuration of MIP Solvers Using LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GRIMIP integrates LLMs as probabilistic surrogates inside Bayesian optimization to perform instance-specific MIP solver configuration and reports over 40% reduction in primal-dual integral on hard benchmark instances.

  2. Unleashing LLMs in Bayesian Optimization: Preference-Guided Framework for Scientific Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LGBO integrates LLM semantic preferences continuously into Bayesian optimization iterations, with a theoretical worst-case guarantee and empirical gains including 90% of best value in 6 iterations on a wet-lab battery task.

  3. LILO: Bayesian Optimization with Natural Language Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LILO integrates LLMs to translate natural language feedback into preference signals for Gaussian process-based Bayesian optimization, outperforming standard preference BO and LLM-only methods on benchmarks.

  4. ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools

    physics.chem-ph 2023-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    ChemCrow augments LLMs with 18 expert chemistry tools to autonomously plan and execute syntheses and guide molecular discoveries in organic synthesis, drug discovery, and materials design.

  5. A Language-Guided Bayesian Optimization for Efficient LoRA Hyperparameter Search

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    LLM embeddings plus Bayesian optimization find better LoRA hyperparameters in ~30 proxy trials than standard published settings.

  6. Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator

    cs.DL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes a four-role framework for LLMs in scientific innovation and reviews methods, benchmarks, and limitations across Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator roles.

  7. Efficient and Principled Scientific Discovery through Bayesian Optimization: A Tutorial

    cs.LG 2026-04 accept novelty 2.0

    Bayesian optimization automates the scientific discovery cycle by modeling observations with surrogate models and using acquisition functions to select experiments that balance known information with new exploration.