REVIEW 4 cited by
ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning
read the original abstract
Over the last few years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as the most important breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) that fundamentally transform research and developments in the field. ChatGPT represents one of the most exciting LLM systems developed recently to showcase impressive skills for language generation and highly attract public attention. Among various exciting applications discovered for ChatGPT in English, the model can process and generate texts for multiple languages due to its multilingual training data. Given the broad adoption of ChatGPT for English in different problems and areas, a natural question is whether ChatGPT can also be applied effectively for other languages or it is necessary to develop more language-specific technologies. The answer to this question requires a thorough evaluation of ChatGPT over multiple tasks with diverse languages and large datasets (i.e., beyond reported anecdotes), which is still missing or limited in current research. Our work aims to fill this gap for the evaluation of ChatGPT and similar LLMs to provide more comprehensive information for multilingual NLP applications. While this work will be an ongoing effort to include additional experiments in the future, our current paper evaluates ChatGPT on 7 different tasks, covering 37 diverse languages with high, medium, low, and extremely low resources. We also focus on the zero-shot learning setting for ChatGPT to improve reproducibility and better simulate the interactions of general users. Compared to the performance of previous models, our extensive experimental results demonstrate a worse performance of ChatGPT for different NLP tasks and languages, calling for further research to develop better models and understanding for multilingual learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Cross-Lingual Response Consistency in Large Language Models: An ILR-Informed Evaluation of Claude Across Six Languages
Claude shows language-dependent variations in response length and style across English, French, Romanian, Spanish, Italian, and German, with French outputs 30% longer than German and distinct patterns in creative and ...
-
Behavioral and Representational Evidence of Binomial Ordering Preferences in Large Language Models
LLMs recover dominant binomial orders from corpora but align less closely with exact preference distributions, with preference strength partially encoded in middle-to-late layers and manipulable via steering.
-
The Tokenizer Tax Across 25 European Languages: Domain Invariance, Cross-Lingual Few-Shot Effects, and the Ukrainian Penalty
Tokenizer fertility varies 2.5x across 25 European languages with domain-invariant rankings, morphological fragmentation in high-fertility cases, and a Ukrainian penalty from pre-training underrepresentation.
-
Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4
Translating unsafe inputs to low-resource languages jailbreaks GPT-4 at rates on par with or exceeding state-of-the-art attacks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.