REVIEW 1 cited by
nanoLM: an Affordable LLM Pre-training Benchmark via Accurate Loss Prediction across Scales
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As language models scale up, it becomes increasingly expensive to verify research ideas because conclusions on small models do not trivially transfer to large ones. A possible solution is to establish a generic system that accurately predicts certain metrics for large models without training them. Existing scaling laws require hyperparameter search on the largest models, limiting their predicative capability. In this paper, we present an approach (namely {\mu}Scaling) to predict the pre-training loss, based on our observations that Maximal Update Parametrization ({\mu}P) enables accurate fitting of scaling laws close to common loss basins in hyperparameter space. With {\mu}Scaling, different model designs can be compared on large scales by training only their smaller counterparts. Further, we introduce nanoLM: an affordable LLM pre-training benchmark that facilitates this new research paradigm. With around 14% of the one-time pre-training cost, we can accurately forecast the loss for models up to 52B. Our goal with nanoLM is to empower researchers with limited resources to reach meaningful conclusions on large models. We also aspire for our benchmark to serve as a bridge between the academic community and the industry. Code for {\mu}Scaling is available at https://github.com/cofe-ai/Mu-scaling. Code for nanoLLM will be available later.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
RoboEgo System Card: An Omnimodal Model with Native Full Duplexity
RoboEgo combines a full-duplex audio/text backbone with vision and action heads to achieve an 80 ms theoretical response granularity, reporting competitive quality and better responsiveness than Qwen2.5-Omni in a smal...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.