REVIEW 16 cited by
Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models
read the original abstract
With the rapid popularity of large language models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, a growing amount of attention is paid to their safety concerns. These models may generate insulting and discriminatory content, reflect incorrect social values, and may be used for malicious purposes such as fraud and dissemination of misleading information. Evaluating and enhancing their safety is particularly essential for the wide application of large language models (LLMs). To further promote the safe deployment of LLMs, we develop a Chinese LLM safety assessment benchmark. Our benchmark explores the comprehensive safety performance of LLMs from two perspectives: 8 kinds of typical safety scenarios and 6 types of more challenging instruction attacks. Our benchmark is based on a straightforward process in which it provides the test prompts and evaluates the safety of the generated responses from the evaluated model. In evaluation, we utilize the LLM's strong evaluation ability and develop it as a safety evaluator by prompting. On top of this benchmark, we conduct safety assessments and analyze 15 LLMs including the OpenAI GPT series and other well-known Chinese LLMs, where we observe some interesting findings. For example, we find that instruction attacks are more likely to expose safety issues of all LLMs. Moreover, to promote the development and deployment of safe, responsible, and ethical AI, we publicly release SafetyPrompts including 100k augmented prompts and responses by LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 16 Pith papers
-
VoxSafeBench: Not Just What Is Said, but Who, How, and Where
VoxSafeBench reveals that speech language models recognize social norms from text but fail to apply them when acoustic cues like speaker or scene determine the appropriate response.
-
Beyond English and Evasion: A Human-Annotated Multi-Domain Benchmark for High-Stakes LLM Safety Evaluation in Chinese
Introduces ChiSafe-PAS, a 1,897-prompt human-annotated Chinese adversarial benchmark for LLM safety with 3-class labels, 9-category obfuscation taxonomy, and domain coverage in self-harm, drugs, fraud, and satire.
-
AlbanianLLMSafety: A Safety Evaluation Dataset for Large Language Models in Albanian
Releases the first public safety evaluation dataset for Albanian LLMs with 2,951 prompts spanning 11 categories including self-harm, violence, and radicalization.
-
DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model
DeepSeek-V2 delivers top-tier open-source LLM performance using only 21B active parameters by compressing the KV cache 93.3% and cutting training costs 42.5% via MLA and DeepSeekMoE.
-
Culturally-Adapted Red-Teaming Across East and Southeast Asian Contexts: A Methodological and Comparative Analysis
Culturally-adapted red-teaming prompts raise ASR by a mean of 9.3 pp over direct translations across 16 language-model pairs in four Asian languages, with DT scoring mean cultural depth of 0.17 versus up to 2.51 for CA.
-
To Lie or Not to Lie? Investigating The Biased Spread of Global Lies by LLMs
LLMs propagate misinformation more in lower-resource languages and lower-HDI countries, with input safety classifiers and retrieval-augmented fact-checking showing cross-lingual and regional gaps.
-
OutSafe-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Offensive Content Detection in Large Language Models
OutSafe-Bench supplies the first large-scale four-modality safety dataset and evaluation framework that exposes persistent unsafe outputs in nine leading multimodal LLMs.
-
Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoning
Math reasoning gains in LLMs rarely transfer to general domains; RL tuning generalizes while SFT causes forgetting and representation drift.
-
WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs
WildGuard is a new open moderation model and dataset for LLM safety that identifies harmful prompts, risky responses, and refusal rates, achieving SOTA open-source performance and sometimes exceeding GPT-4 while cutti...
-
GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts
GPTFuzz is a black-box fuzzing framework that mutates seed jailbreak templates to automatically generate effective attacks, achieving over 90% success rates on models including ChatGPT and Llama-2.
-
Harder to Defend: Towards Chinese Toxicity Attacks via Implicit Enhancement and Obfuscation Rewriting
CITA generates Chinese implicit toxicity samples that cause 69.48% average missed detection across seven tested detectors while preserving harmfulness, and the same data improves robustness when used to fine-tune a CI...
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...
-
JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Data
JT-Safe-V2 is a safety-by-design LLM that reports SOTA scores on both capability and safety benchmarks while Safe-MoMA cuts inference cost over 30 percent.
-
TWGuard: A Case Study of LLM Safety Guardrails for Localized Linguistic Contexts
TWGuard achieves +0.289 F1 improvement and 94.9% false-positive reduction for LLM safety guardrails in the Taiwan linguistic context compared to foundation models and baselines.
-
Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey that creates taxonomies for jailbreak attacks and defenses on LLMs, subdivides them into sub-classes, and compares evaluation approaches.
-
DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
DeepSeek LLM 67B exceeds LLaMA-2 70B on code, mathematics and reasoning benchmarks after pre-training on 2 trillion tokens and alignment via SFT and DPO.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.