Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Boosting Theory-of-Mind Performance in Large Language Models via Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.11490 v3 pith:P7UU72CP submitted 2023-04-22 cs.AI cs.CL

Boosting Theory-of-Mind Performance in Large Language Models via Prompting

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords accuracylearningreasoninggpt-4in-contextllmsmodelsperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) excel in many tasks in 2023, but they still face challenges in complex reasoning. Theory-of-mind (ToM) tasks, which require understanding agents' beliefs, goals, and mental states, are essential for common-sense reasoning involving humans, making it crucial to enhance LLM performance in this area. This study measures the ToM performance of GPT-4 and three GPT-3.5 variants (Davinci-2, Davinci-3, GPT-3.5-Turbo), and investigates the effectiveness of in-context learning in improving their ToM comprehension. We evaluated prompts featuring two-shot chain of thought reasoning and step-by-step thinking instructions. We found that LLMs trained with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) (all models excluding Davinci-2) improved their ToM accuracy via in-context learning. GPT-4 performed best in zero-shot settings, reaching nearly 80% ToM accuracy, but still fell short of the 87% human accuracy on the test set. However, when supplied with prompts for in-context learning, all RLHF-trained LLMs exceeded 80% ToM accuracy, with GPT-4 reaching 100%. These results demonstrate that appropriate prompting enhances LLM ToM reasoning, and they underscore the context-dependent nature of LLM cognitive capacities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploring a Gamified Personality Assessment Method through Interaction with LLM Agents Embodying Different Personalities

    cs.HC 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A gamified system with multiple LLM agents of varied personalities gathers interaction data to produce more effective and interpretable Big Five personality assessments than single-context methods.

  2. TARS: A Theory-of-Mind Agent for Personalized In-IDE Code Comprehension

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    An in-IDE Theory-of-Mind agent produced suggestive, non-significant speed gains and self-reported personalization benefits in an 18-developer study.

  3. A Survey of Large Language Models for Perception and Measurement of Human Psychology

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey proposing a three-pillar framework to evaluate LLMs as tools for measuring latent psychological constructs and reviewing applications in personality and mental health.