REVIEW 5 cited by
Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thought
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thought
read the original abstract
Modern systems for multi-hop question answering (QA) typically break questions into a sequence of reasoning steps, termed chain-of-thought (CoT), before arriving at a final answer. Often, multiple chains are sampled and aggregated through a voting mechanism over the final answers, but the intermediate steps themselves are discarded. While such approaches improve performance, they do not consider the relations between intermediate steps across chains and do not provide a unified explanation for the predicted answer. We introduce Multi-Chain Reasoning (MCR), an approach which prompts large language models to meta-reason over multiple chains of thought, rather than aggregating their answers. MCR examines different reasoning chains, mixes information between them and selects the most relevant facts in generating an explanation and predicting the answer. MCR outperforms strong baselines on 7 multi-hop QA datasets. Moreover, our analysis reveals that MCR explanations exhibit high quality, enabling humans to verify its answers.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines
DSPy compiles short declarative programs into LM pipelines that self-optimize and outperform both standard few-shot prompting and expert-written chains on math, retrieval, and QA tasks.
-
Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Reflexion lets LLM agents improve via stored verbal reflections on task feedback, reaching 91% pass@1 on HumanEval and outperforming prior GPT-4 results.
-
ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching
ZeroSearch simulates search engine interactions via supervised fine-tuning of a retrieval module and curriculum-based RL degradation of document quality, achieving comparable or superior performance to real search eng...
-
ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching
ZeroSearch uses supervised fine-tuning to create a simulated retrieval module and curriculum-based RL rollouts that degrade document quality to train LLMs on search capabilities without real search API calls.
-
Step-DPO: Step-wise Preference Optimization for Long-chain Reasoning of LLMs
Step-DPO performs preference optimization on individual reasoning steps rather than complete answers, producing nearly 3% accuracy gains on MATH for 70B+ parameter models with 10K preference pairs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.