Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Objectives Matter: Understanding the Impact of Self-Supervised Objectives on Vision Transformer Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.13089 v1 pith:XZYSBM62 submitted 2023-04-25 cs.LG cs.CVeess.IV

Objectives Matter: Understanding the Impact of Self-Supervised Objectives on Vision Transformer Representations

classification cs.LG cs.CVeess.IV
keywords featureslearningobjectivestransferdifferencesjoint-embeddingrepresentationssimilar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Joint-embedding based learning (e.g., SimCLR, MoCo, DINO) and reconstruction-based learning (e.g., BEiT, SimMIM, MAE) are the two leading paradigms for self-supervised learning of vision transformers, but they differ substantially in their transfer performance. Here, we aim to explain these differences by analyzing the impact of these objectives on the structure and transferability of the learned representations. Our analysis reveals that reconstruction-based learning features are significantly dissimilar to joint-embedding based learning features and that models trained with similar objectives learn similar features even across architectures. These differences arise early in the network and are primarily driven by attention and normalization layers. We find that joint-embedding features yield better linear probe transfer for classification because the different objectives drive different distributions of information and invariances in the learned representation. These differences explain opposite trends in transfer performance for downstream tasks that require spatial specificity in features. Finally, we address how fine-tuning changes reconstructive representations to enable better transfer, showing that fine-tuning re-organizes the information to be more similar to pre-trained joint embedding models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the network

    cs.CV 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Intermediate layers of a contrastively trained vision-language encoder yield stronger general embeddings than the output layer, enabling state-of-the-art performance across image/video classification, multimodal QA, a...