Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Deep Intellectual Property Protection: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.14613 v2 pith:XHOXYR2E submitted 2023-04-28 cs.AI cs.CR

classification cs.AIcs.CR
keywords deepprotectionsurveydnnsmethodsfingerprintingintellectualperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), from AlexNet to ResNet to ChatGPT, have made revolutionary progress in recent years, and are widely used in various fields. The high performance of DNNs requires a huge amount of high-quality data, expensive computing hardware, and excellent DNN architectures that are costly to obtain. Therefore, trained DNNs are becoming valuable assets and must be considered the Intellectual Property (IP) of the legitimate owner who created them, in order to protect trained DNN models from illegal reproduction, stealing, redistribution, or abuse. Although being a new emerging and interdisciplinary field, numerous DNN model IP protection methods have been proposed. Given this period of rapid evolution, the goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive survey of two mainstream DNN IP protection methods: deep watermarking and deep fingerprinting, with a proposed taxonomy. More than 190 research contributions are included in this survey, covering many aspects of Deep IP Protection: problem definition, main threats and challenges, merits and demerits of deep watermarking and deep fingerprinting methods, evaluation metrics, and performance discussion. We finish the survey by identifying promising directions for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ADS-C: Antidistillation Sampling for Classification

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    ADS-C perturbs served classification probabilities under a per-input margin budget, preserving every top-1 prediction while degrading distilled students by 13–30 percentage points.

  2. Ownership Verification of DNN Models Using White-Box Adversarial Attacks with Specified Probability Manipulation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors introduce I-FDGSM, an iterative adversarial attack that sets a target class probability to a specified value while keeping the true class dominant, and use it to verify whether a cloud model is the original model.

  3. Protecting Intellectual Property of EEG-based Neural Networks with Watermarking

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A wonder filter watermark derived from an owner's digital signature is embedded into EEG models, with experiments on DEAP claiming persistence through fine-tuning, transfer learning, and pruning.

  4. Intellectual Property in Graph-Based Machine Learning as a Service: Attacks and Defenses

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review that organizes graph-ML IP protection into model-level and data-level attacks and defenses, and ships a benchmark library, PyGIP.

Pith tools