Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learning to Reason and Memorize with Self-Notes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.00833 v2 pith:PWU6ADS3 submitted 2023-05-01 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords reasoningmodelself-noteschain-of-thoughtcontextinputmethodmulti-step
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models have been shown to struggle with multi-step reasoning, and do not retain previous reasoning steps for future use. We propose a simple method for solving both of these problems by allowing the model to take Self-Notes. Unlike recent chain-of-thought or scratchpad approaches, the model can deviate from the input context at any time to explicitly think and write down its thoughts. This allows the model to perform reasoning on the fly as it reads the context and even integrate previous reasoning steps, thus enhancing its memory with useful information and enabling multi-step reasoning. Experiments across a wide variety of tasks demonstrate that our method can outperform chain-of-thought and scratchpad methods by taking Self-Notes that interleave the input text.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Generating Diverse Hypotheses for Inductive Reasoning

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MoC generates K diverse concepts, then conditions hypothesis generation on each concept, yielding more semantically diverse LLM hypotheses and higher inductive-reasoning accuracy than IID sampling at equal K.

  2. Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This survey organizes LLM synthetic data research around quality, diversity, and complexity, claiming quality mainly helps in-distribution generalization, diversity mainly helps out-of-distribution generalization, and...

Pith tools