Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the isotropy of SnIa absolute magnitudes in the Pantheon+ and SH0ES samples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12819 v1 pith:ZUOSLJE6 submitted 2023-05-22 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

On the isotropy of SnIa absolute magnitudes in the Pantheon+ and SH0ES samples

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords anisotropypantheonsamplessh0esfindisotropicsimulatedbins
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We use the hemisphere comparison method to test the isotropy of the SnIa absolute magnitudes of the Pantheon+ and SH0ES samples in various redshift/distance bins. We compare the identified levels of anisotropy in each bin with Monte-Carlo simulations of corresponding isotropised data to estimate the frequency of such levels of anisotropy in the context of an underlying isotropic cosmological. We find that the identified levels of anisotropy in all bins are consistent with the Monte-Carlo isotropic simulated samples. However, in the real samples for both the Pantheon+ and the SH0ES cases we find sharp changes of the level of anisotropy occuring at distances less than $40Mpc$. For the Pantheon+ sample we find that the redshift bin $[0.005,0.01]$ is significantly more anisotropic than the other 5 redshift bins considered. For the SH0ES sample we find a sharp drop of the anisotropy level at distances larger than about $30Mpc$. These anisotropy transitions are relatively rare in the Monte-Carlo isotropic simulated data and occur in $2\%$ of the SH0ES simulated data and at about $7\%$ of the Pantheon+ isotropic simulated samples. This effect is consistent with the experience of an off center observer in a $30Mpc$ bubble of distinct physics or systematics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Impact of inhomogeneous curvature on growth rate measurements from magnitude fluctuations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Full-GR simulations find that inhomogeneous curvature produces only sub-dominant systematic offsets in growth-rate measurements from magnitude fluctuations at z ≲ 0.2 relative to current statistical errors.

  2. Updates on dipolar anisotropy in local measurements of the Hubble constant from Cosmicflows-4

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Local Hubble constant anisotropy in Cosmicflows-4 data is primarily attributed to peculiar velocities and survey structure rather than cosmic-scale isotropy violation, with limited implications for the Hubble tension.