REVIEW 9 cited by
HuatuoGPT, towards Taming Language Model to Be a Doctor
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
HuatuoGPT, towards Taming Language Model to Be a Doctor
read the original abstract
In this paper, we present HuatuoGPT, a large language model (LLM) for medical consultation. The core recipe of HuatuoGPT is to leverage both \textit{distilled data from ChatGPT} and \textit{real-world data from doctors} in the supervised fine-tuned stage. The responses of ChatGPT are usually detailed, well-presented and informative while it cannot perform like a doctor in many aspects, e.g. for integrative diagnosis. We argue that real-world data from doctors would be complementary to distilled data in the sense the former could tame a distilled language model to perform like doctors. To better leverage the strengths of both data, we train a reward model to align the language model with the merits that both data bring, following an RLAIF (reinforced learning from AI feedback) fashion. To evaluate and benchmark the models, we propose a comprehensive evaluation scheme (including automatic and manual metrics). Experimental results demonstrate that HuatuoGPT achieves state-of-the-art results in performing medical consultation among open-source LLMs in GPT-4 evaluation, human evaluation, and medical benchmark datasets. It is worth noting that by using additional real-world data and RLAIF, the distilled language model (i.e., HuatuoGPT) outperforms its teacher model ChatGPT in most cases. Our code, data, and models are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/HuatuoGPT}. The online demo is available at \url{https://www.HuatuoGPT.cn/}.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
Enhancing Pathological VLMs with Cross-scale Reasoning
Presents Scale-VQA benchmark for cross-scale pathology VQA and RL-trained ScaleReasoner-R1 model that reaches SOTA on the new benchmark plus existing single-scale tasks.
-
PathScale-R1: Cross-scale Reasoning for Pathological Image Analysis
PathScale-R1 and PathScale-VQA raise cross-scale pathology VQA accuracy to 83% by training on expert multi-magnification paths with anti-shortcut curation and scale-aware RL.
-
Enhancing Pathological VLMs with Cross-scale Reasoning
Cross-scale supervision from a leakage-curated multi-magnification VQA benchmark improves pathology VLMs on both multi-image and single-image evaluation.
-
SCOPE and SCION: A Benchmark and an Auditable Reference Pipeline for Schema Induction and Fusion from Text
A 24-dataset benchmark for inducing schema graphs from raw text, plus an auditable LLM-based pipeline that reports the highest scores on the benchmark's four schema-similarity metrics.
-
LLM-AutoDP: Automatic Data Processing via LLM Agents for Model Fine-tuning
LLM agents iteratively generate and optimize data processing strategies for fine-tuning, delivering over 80% win rates versus unprocessed data and 65% versus LLM-based AutoML baselines while cutting search time by up to 10x.
-
CURE-Med: Curriculum-Informed Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Medical Reasoning
CURE-MED pairs a new 13-language medical reasoning benchmark with curriculum RL to raise logical correctness to 70% and language consistency to 95% at 32B scale while outperforming baselines.
-
Toward a Vision-Language Foundation Model for Medical Data: Multimodal Dataset and Benchmarks for Vietnamese PET/CT Report Generation
A new Vietnamese PET/CT-report dataset improves medical VLM report generation and VQA, but clinical F1 scores remain modest.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...
-
Ask Patients with Patience: Enabling LLMs for Human-Centric Medical Dialogue with Grounded Reasoning
APP is a multi-turn LLM framework for medical dialogue that combines empathetic questioning, Bayesian active learning, and guideline-based reasoning, outperforming baselines on a new simulated-patient benchmark in acc...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.