Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How to escape sharp minima with random perturbations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.15659 v3 pith:4WQ5ENMG submitted 2023-05-25 cs.LG cs.AImath.OC

classification cs.LGcs.AImath.OC
keywords minimaflatalgorithmapproximatecostnotionalgorithmsefficiently
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern machine learning applications have witnessed the remarkable success of optimization algorithms that are designed to find flat minima. Motivated by this design choice, we undertake a formal study that (i) formulates the notion of flat minima, and (ii) studies the complexity of finding them. Specifically, we adopt the trace of the Hessian of the cost function as a measure of flatness, and use it to formally define the notion of approximate flat minima. Under this notion, we then analyze algorithms that find approximate flat minima efficiently. For general cost functions, we discuss a gradient-based algorithm that finds an approximate flat local minimum efficiently. The main component of the algorithm is to use gradients computed from randomly perturbed iterates to estimate a direction that leads to flatter minima. For the setting where the cost function is an empirical risk over training data, we present a faster algorithm that is inspired by a recently proposed practical algorithm called sharpness-aware minimization, supporting its success in practice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Monge SAM: Robust Reparameterization-Invariant Sharpness-Aware Minimization Based on Loss Geometry

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    M-SAM replaces SAM's Euclidean perturbation with a Monge-metric perturbation, a scaled version of SAM's step, and claims improved robustness and reduced attraction to saddle points.

Pith tools