Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

INSTRUCTEVAL: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.04757 v3 pith:3COJXHXT submitted 2023-06-07 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelsevaluationlanguageinstructevalinstruction-tunedholisticlargealignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction-tuned large language models have revolutionized natural language processing and have shown great potential in applications such as conversational agents. These models, such as GPT-4, can not only master language but also solve complex tasks in areas like mathematics, coding, medicine, and law. Despite their impressive capabilities, there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding their full potential, primarily due to the black-box nature of many models and the absence of holistic evaluation studies. To address these challenges, we present INSTRUCTEVAL, a more comprehensive evaluation suite designed specifically for instruction-tuned large language models. Unlike previous works, our evaluation involves a rigorous assessment of models based on problem-solving, writing ability, and alignment to human values. We take a holistic approach to analyze various factors affecting model performance, including the pretraining foundation, instruction-tuning data, and training methods. Our findings reveal that the quality of instruction data is the most crucial factor in scaling model performance. While open-source models demonstrate impressive writing abilities, there is substantial room for improvement in problem-solving and alignment. We are encouraged by the rapid development of models by the open-source community, but we also highlight the need for rigorous evaluation to support claims made about these models. Through INSTRUCTEVAL, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of instruction-tuned models and advancements in their capabilities. INSTRUCTEVAL is publicly available at https://github.com/declare-lab/instruct-eval.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 26 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Obey, Diverge, Collapse: Blind Obedience to Incorrect Instructions Drives Code LLMs to Irrecoverable Code Semantic Collapse

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Code LLMs correctly label incorrect repair instructions as wrong, then follow them anyway, creating compounding Ghost Errors that self-guided iterative repair usually cannot reverse.

  2. Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On binary verdicts, Pearson, Spearman, Kendall's tau-b, phi, and the Matthews correlation are a single statistic, so most multi-metric agreement reports repeat one number under different names.

Pith tools