REVIEW 2 cited by
Catapults in SGD: spikes in the training loss and their impact on generalization through feature learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we first present an explanation regarding the common occurrence of spikes in the training loss when neural networks are trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We provide evidence that the spikes in the training loss of SGD are "catapults", an optimization phenomenon originally observed in GD with large learning rates in [Lewkowycz et al. 2020]. We empirically show that these catapults occur in a low-dimensional subspace spanned by the top eigenvectors of the tangent kernel, for both GD and SGD. Second, we posit an explanation for how catapults lead to better generalization by demonstrating that catapults promote feature learning by increasing alignment with the Average Gradient Outer Product (AGOP) of the true predictor. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a smaller batch size in SGD induces a larger number of catapults, thereby improving AGOP alignment and test performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SoftSignSGD(S3): An Enhanced Optimizer for Practical DNN Training and Loss Spikes Minimization Beyond Adam
S3, an optimizer with a p-th order momentum denominator, equal EMA coefficients, and Nesterov acceleration, is claimed to match AdamW's 100k-step perplexity at 50k steps while avoiding loss spikes.
-
The Features at Convergence Theorem: a first-principles alternative to the Neural Feature Ansatz for how networks learn representations
FACT is a first-order stationarity identity for weight matrices that matches or beats the Neural Feature Ansatz as a description of learned features at convergence.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.