Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Operationalising Representation in Natural Language Processing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.08193 v2 pith:7MJMET4F submitted 2023-06-14 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords representationoperationalisingscienceclaimscognitivecriterianotionnovel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite its centrality in the philosophy of cognitive science, there has been little prior philosophical work engaging with the notion of representation in contemporary NLP practice. This paper attempts to fill that lacuna: drawing on ideas from cognitive science, I introduce a framework for evaluating the representational claims made about components of neural NLP models, proposing three criteria with which to evaluate whether a component of a model represents a property and operationalising these criteria using probing classifiers, a popular analysis technique in NLP (and deep learning more broadly). The project of operationalising a philosophically-informed notion of representation should be of interest to both philosophers of science and NLP practitioners. It affords philosophers a novel testing-ground for claims about the nature of representation, and helps NLPers organise the large literature on probing experiments, suggesting novel avenues for empirical research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Propositional Interpretability in Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Chalmers proposes propositional interpretability, interpreting AI in terms of beliefs, desires, and credences, and sets the challenge of thought logging all such attitudes over time.

Pith tools