Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Matching Pairs: Attributing Fine-Tuned Models to their Pre-Trained Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.09308 v1 pith:MBJFCXOA submitted 2023-06-15 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CR
keywords modelmodelspre-trainedfine-tunedbackbasegenerativelanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The wide applicability and adaptability of generative large language models (LLMs) has enabled their rapid adoption. While the pre-trained models can perform many tasks, such models are often fine-tuned to improve their performance on various downstream applications. However, this leads to issues over violation of model licenses, model theft, and copyright infringement. Moreover, recent advances show that generative technology is capable of producing harmful content which exacerbates the problems of accountability within model supply chains. Thus, we need a method to investigate how a model was trained or a piece of text was generated and what their pre-trained base model was. In this paper we take the first step to address this open problem by tracing back the origin of a given fine-tuned LLM to its corresponding pre-trained base model. We consider different knowledge levels and attribution strategies, and find that we can correctly trace back 8 out of the 10 fine tuned models with our best method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Annotated Reading of 'The Singer of Tales' in the LLM Era

    cs.CY 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM generation resembles oral-formulaic composition: single-pass, pattern-based, and non-authorial, so AI output should be treated as a new post-literate medium.

Pith tools