Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Impacts and Risk of Generative AI Technology on Cyber Defense

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.13033 v1 pith:JHYPZ7SS submitted 2023-06-22 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords cybergenaidefensestrategiesadoptioncontentgenerativeposed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a powerful technology capable of autonomously producing highly realistic content in various domains, such as text, images, audio, and videos. With its potential for positive applications in creative arts, content generation, virtual assistants, and data synthesis, GenAI has garnered significant attention and adoption. However, the increasing adoption of GenAI raises concerns about its potential misuse for crafting convincing phishing emails, generating disinformation through deepfake videos, and spreading misinformation via authentic-looking social media posts, posing a new set of challenges and risks in the realm of cybersecurity. To combat the threats posed by GenAI, we propose leveraging the Cyber Kill Chain (CKC) to understand the lifecycle of cyberattacks, as a foundational model for cyber defense. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the risk areas introduced by the offensive use of GenAI techniques in each phase of the CKC framework. We also analyze the strategies employed by threat actors and examine their utilization throughout different phases of the CKC, highlighting the implications for cyber defense. Additionally, we propose GenAI-enabled defense strategies that are both attack-aware and adaptive. These strategies encompass various techniques such as detection, deception, and adversarial training, among others, aiming to effectively mitigate the risks posed by GenAI-induced cyber threats.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GenWorld: Towards Detecting AI-generated Real-world Simulation Videos

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GenWorld is a 100k real-world-simulation video forgery benchmark, and SpannDetector uses multi-view 3D consistency to detect AI-generated videos, especially world-model outputs that fool existing detectors.

  2. Cloud failure and cyber insurance: calibration of stress scenarios and diversification

    q-fin.RM 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-regime cyber-insurance model balances ordinary-loss volatility against cloud-outage accumulation risk and produces provider-level underwriting targets.

  3. AegisShield: Democratizing Cyber Threat Modeling with Generative AI

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A GPT-4o based tool, AegisShield, automates STRIDE threat modeling with MITRE ATT&CK mapping and produces simpler, semantically overlapping threat descriptions, though mapping success is measured by non-null IDs rathe...

  4. Challenges in GenAI and Authentication: a scoping review

    cs.CR 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A scoping review of 13 selected papers summarizes security challenges, attacks, solutions, and research gaps in authentication under generative AI.

Pith tools