Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on Grammatical Error Correction for Brazilian Portuguese

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.15788 v2 pith:MU7AW4F7 submitted 2023-06-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords brazilianportuguesegpt-4llmscorrectionerrorgpt-3grammatical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the effectiveness of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, two large language models, as Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) tools for Brazilian Portuguese and compare their performance against Microsoft Word and Google Docs. We introduce a GEC dataset for Brazilian Portuguese with four categories: Grammar, Spelling, Internet, and Fast typing. Our results show that while GPT-4 has higher recall than other methods, LLMs tend to have lower precision, leading to overcorrection. This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs as practical GEC tools for Brazilian Portuguese and encourages further exploration of LLMs for non-English languages and other educational settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explanation based In-Context Demonstrations Retrieval for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Retrieving in-context demonstrations by matching natural-language grammatical error explanations beats input-text similarity for few-shot multilingual GEC.

Pith tools