Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Graph Neural Networks based Log Anomaly Detection and Explanation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.00527 v3 pith:RXFPUHQV submitted 2023-07-02 cs.SE cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.LG
keywords detectionanomalyeventgraphdatasetsmethodsnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Event logs are widely used to record the status of high-tech systems, making log anomaly detection important for monitoring those systems. Most existing log anomaly detection methods take a log event count matrix or log event sequences as input, exploiting quantitative and/or sequential relationships between log events to detect anomalies. Unfortunately, only considering quantitative or sequential relationships may result in low detection accuracy. To alleviate this problem, we propose a graph-based method for unsupervised log anomaly detection, dubbed Logs2Graphs, which first converts event logs into attributed, directed, and weighted graphs, and then leverages graph neural networks to perform graph-level anomaly detection. Specifically, we introduce One-Class Digraph Inception Convolutional Networks, abbreviated as OCDiGCN, a novel graph neural network model for detecting graph-level anomalies in a collection of attributed, directed, and weighted graphs. By coupling the graph representation and anomaly detection steps, OCDiGCN can learn a representation that is especially suited for anomaly detection, resulting in a high detection accuracy. Importantly, for each identified anomaly, we additionally provide a small subset of nodes that play a crucial role in OCDiGCN's prediction as explanations, which can offer valuable cues for subsequent root cause diagnosis. Experiments on five benchmark datasets show that Logs2Graphs performs at least on par with state-of-the-art log anomaly detection methods on simple datasets while largely outperforming state-of-the-art log anomaly detection methods on complicated datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TPLogAD: Unsupervised Log Anomaly Detection Based on Event Templates and Key Parameters

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TPLogAD claims F1 scores of 0.95 to 0.97 on BGL, HDFS, ThunderBird, and Spirit by combining BERT-based template embeddings with typed parameter encodings in a BiLSTM-plus-attention framework.

Pith tools