Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.02694 v5 pith:7BHU2OCP submitted 2023-07-05 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords metricslearningdeepfunctionslossapplicationsdifferentevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of loss functions and performance metrics in deep learning, highlighting key developments and practical insights across diverse application areas. We begin by outlining fundamental considerations in classic tasks such as regression and classification, then extend our analysis to specialized domains like computer vision and natural language processing including retrieval-augmented generation. In each setting, we systematically examine how different loss functions and evaluation metrics can be paired to address task-specific challenges such as class imbalance, outliers, and sequence-level optimization. Key contributions of this work include: (1) a unified framework for understanding how losses and metrics align with different learning objectives, (2) an in-depth discussion of multi-loss setups that balance competing goals, and (3) new insights into specialized metrics used to evaluate modern applications like retrieval-augmented generation, where faithfulness and context relevance are pivotal. Along the way, we highlight best practices for selecting or combining losses and metrics based on empirical behaviors and domain constraints. Finally, we identify open problems and promising directions, including the automation of loss-function search and the development of robust, interpretable evaluation measures for increasingly complex deep learning tasks. Our review aims to equip researchers and practitioners with clearer guidance in designing effective training pipelines and reliable model assessments for a wide spectrum of real-world applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Courage to Stop: Overcoming Sunk Cost Fallacy in Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Introduces LEAST, an adaptive early-episode-stopping rule for off-policy deep RL that improves learning efficiency on MuJoCo and DeepMind Control benchmarks.

Pith tools