Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

RecallM: An Adaptable Memory Mechanism with Temporal Understanding for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.02738 v3 pith:GOGTPS6F submitted 2023-07-06 cs.AI cs.CLcs.SC

RecallM: An Adaptable Memory Mechanism with Temporal Understanding for Large Language Models

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.SC
keywords recallmlong-termmemoryarchitecturelargellmstemporalunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made extraordinary progress in the field of Artificial Intelligence and have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a large variety of tasks and domains. However, as we venture closer to creating Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems, we recognize the need to supplement LLMs with long-term memory to overcome the context window limitation and more importantly, to create a foundation for sustained reasoning, cumulative learning and long-term user interaction. In this paper we propose RecallM, a novel architecture for providing LLMs with an adaptable and updatable long-term memory mechanism. Unlike previous methods, the RecallM architecture is particularly effective at belief updating and maintaining a temporal understanding of the knowledge provided to it. We demonstrate through various experiments the effectiveness of this architecture. Furthermore, through our own temporal understanding and belief updating experiments, we show that RecallM is four times more effective than using a vector database for updating knowledge previously stored in long-term memory. We also demonstrate that RecallM shows competitive performance on general question-answering and in-context learning tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Presentation, Not Mechanism: A Render Confound in Deprecation-Aware Memory Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A render-matched control explains away almost all (+0.159 of +0.184) of a fine-grained revision-ledger's apparent advantage over a flat baseline, leaving a near-zero mechanism residual and making coarse invalidation t...