REVIEW 3 cited by
VideoGLUE: Video General Understanding Evaluation of Foundation Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
VideoGLUE: Video General Understanding Evaluation of Foundation Models
read the original abstract
We evaluate the video understanding capabilities of existing foundation models (FMs) using a carefully designed experiment protocol consisting of three hallmark tasks (action recognition,temporal localization, and spatiotemporal localization), eight datasets well received by the community, and four adaptation methods tailoring an FM for downstream tasks. Furthermore, we jointly profile FMs' efficacy and efficiency when adapting to general video understanding tasks using cost measurements during both training and inference. Our main findings areas follows. First, task-specialized models significantly outperform the seven FMs studied in this work, in sharp contrast to what FMs have achieved in natural language and image understanding. Second, video-native FMs, whose pretraining data mainly contains the video modality, are generally better than image-native FMs in classifying motion-rich videos, localizing actions in time, and understanding a video of more than one action. Third, the video-native FMs can perform well on video tasks under light adaptations to downstream tasks (e.g., freezing the FM backbones), while image-native FMs win in full end-to-end finetuning. The first two observations reveal the need and tremendous opportunities to conduct research on video-focused FMs, and the last confirms that both tasks and adaptation methods matter when it comes to the evaluation of FMs. Our code is released under: https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/official/projects/videoglue.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
One Trajectory, One Token: Grounded Video Tokenization via Panoptic Sub-object Trajectory
TrajViT tokenizes videos via panoptic sub-object trajectories, achieving 10x token reduction and outperforming ViT3D by 6% on retrieval and 5.2% on VideoQA tasks with faster training and inference.
-
Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video
V-JEPA models trained only on feature prediction from 2 million public videos achieve 81.9% on Kinetics-400, 72.2% on Something-Something-v2, and 77.9% on ImageNet-1K using frozen ViT-H/16 backbones.
-
Video-Language Understanding: A Survey from Model Architecture, Model Training, and Data Perspectives
Survey summarizing video-language understanding tasks, challenges, and methods from architecture, training, and data perspectives, including performance comparisons and future directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.