Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

VideoGLUE: Video General Understanding Evaluation of Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.03166 v3 pith:VVFTCPRP submitted 2023-07-06 cs.CV

VideoGLUE: Video General Understanding Evaluation of Foundation Models

classification cs.CV
keywords tasksvideounderstandingmodelsactionadaptationdownstreamevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We evaluate the video understanding capabilities of existing foundation models (FMs) using a carefully designed experiment protocol consisting of three hallmark tasks (action recognition,temporal localization, and spatiotemporal localization), eight datasets well received by the community, and four adaptation methods tailoring an FM for downstream tasks. Furthermore, we jointly profile FMs' efficacy and efficiency when adapting to general video understanding tasks using cost measurements during both training and inference. Our main findings areas follows. First, task-specialized models significantly outperform the seven FMs studied in this work, in sharp contrast to what FMs have achieved in natural language and image understanding. Second, video-native FMs, whose pretraining data mainly contains the video modality, are generally better than image-native FMs in classifying motion-rich videos, localizing actions in time, and understanding a video of more than one action. Third, the video-native FMs can perform well on video tasks under light adaptations to downstream tasks (e.g., freezing the FM backbones), while image-native FMs win in full end-to-end finetuning. The first two observations reveal the need and tremendous opportunities to conduct research on video-focused FMs, and the last confirms that both tasks and adaptation methods matter when it comes to the evaluation of FMs. Our code is released under: https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/official/projects/videoglue.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. One Trajectory, One Token: Grounded Video Tokenization via Panoptic Sub-object Trajectory

    cs.CV 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TrajViT tokenizes videos via panoptic sub-object trajectories, achieving 10x token reduction and outperforming ViT3D by 6% on retrieval and 5.2% on VideoQA tasks with faster training and inference.

  2. Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Video

    cs.CV 2024-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    V-JEPA models trained only on feature prediction from 2 million public videos achieve 81.9% on Kinetics-400, 72.2% on Something-Something-v2, and 77.9% on ImageNet-1K using frozen ViT-H/16 backbones.

  3. Video-Language Understanding: A Survey from Model Architecture, Model Training, and Data Perspectives

    cs.CL 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Survey summarizing video-language understanding tasks, challenges, and methods from architecture, training, and data perspectives, including performance comparisons and future directions.