Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SuperCLUE: A Comprehensive Chinese Large Language Model Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.15020 v1 pith:IWXQGJHD submitted 2023-07-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords questionsbenchmarkchineseopen-endedhumanpreferencessuperclueaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to be integrated into human daily lives. Therefore, user preference is the most critical criterion for assessing LLMs' performance in real-world scenarios. However, existing benchmarks mainly focus on measuring models' accuracy using multi-choice questions, which limits the understanding of their capabilities in real applications. We fill this gap by proposing a comprehensive Chinese benchmark SuperCLUE, named after another popular Chinese LLM benchmark CLUE. SuperCLUE encompasses three sub-tasks: actual users' queries and ratings derived from an LLM battle platform (CArena), open-ended questions with single and multiple-turn dialogues (OPEN), and closed-ended questions with the same stems as open-ended single-turn ones (CLOSE). Our study shows that accuracy on closed-ended questions is insufficient to reflect human preferences achieved on open-ended ones. At the same time, they can complement each other to predict actual user preferences. We also demonstrate that GPT-4 is a reliable judge to automatically evaluate human preferences on open-ended questions in a Chinese context. Our benchmark will be released at https://www.CLUEbenchmarks.com

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Characterizing Bias: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Simplified versus Traditional Chinese

    cs.CL 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows LLMs are more accurate in Simplified Chinese for regional terms but favor Taiwanese names in simulated hiring, revealing task-dependent bias between Chinese script variants.

  2. DoPI: Doctor-like Proactive Interrogation LLM for Traditional Chinese Medicine

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    DoPI pairs a knowledge-graph-guided questioning model with a TCM expert model and claims 84.68% diagnostic accuracy, but the benchmark is built from the same symptom-disease rules that drive the system.

Pith tools