Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

User-Controlled Knowledge Fusion in Large Language Models: Balancing Creativity and Hallucination

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.16139 v1 pith:4BA4HKT4 submitted 2023-07-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords knowledgebalancecreativitydegreellmsresponsesapproachduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In modern dialogue systems, the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has grown exponentially due to their capacity to generate diverse, relevant, and creative responses. Despite their strengths, striking a balance between the LLMs' creativity and their faithfulness to external knowledge remains a key challenge. This paper presents an innovative user-controllable mechanism that modulates the balance between an LLM's imaginative capabilities and its adherence to factual information. Our approach incorporates a numerical tag during the fine-tuning phase of the LLM's training, representing the degree of faithfulness to the reference knowledge in the generated responses. This degree is computed through an automated process that measures lexical overlap using ROUGE scores, semantic similarity using Sentence-BERT embeddings, and an LLM's self-evaluation score. During model inference, users can manipulate this numerical tag, thus controlling the degree of the LLM's reliance on external knowledge. We conduct extensive experiments across various scenarios, demonstrating the adaptability of our method and its efficacy in ensuring the quality and accuracy of the LLM's responses. The results highlight the potential of our approach to enhance the versatility of LLMs while maintaining a balance between creativity and hallucination.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Queries to Criteria: Understanding How Astronomers Evaluate LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A user study of an astronomy RAG bot identifies the question types and evaluation criteria astronomers actually use, and turns them into a 40-item benchmark.

  2. Towards Mitigation of Hallucination for LLM-empowered Agents: Progressive Generalization Bound Exploration and Watchdog Monitor

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A black-box hallucination watchdog that stores previously hallucinated queries in a vector database and flags new queries by embedding similarity and semantic entropy.

Pith tools