Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:2308.01090 v3 · submitted 2 Aug 2023

Exploring CP Violation beyond the Standard Model and the PQ Quality with Electric Dipole Moments

Kiwoon Choi, Sang Hui Im, Krzysztof Jod{l}owski

The paper says

“Our results imply that EDMs can reveal unambiguous sign of CEDMs while identifying the origin of the axion vacuum value, however it requires further knowledge of low energy parameters induced by the gluon CEDM.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In some models of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM), one of the leading low energy consequences of the model appears in the form of the chromo-electric dipole moments (CEDMs) of the gluons and light quarks. We examine if these CEDMs can be distinguished from the QCD θ-term through the experimentally measurable nuclear and atomic electric dipole moments (EDMs) in both cases with and without the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) mechanism solving the strong CP problem. We find that the nucleon EDMs show a distinctive pattern when the EDMs are dominantly induced by the light quark CEDMs without the PQ mechanism. In the presence of the PQ mechanism, the QCD θ-parameter corresponds to the vacuum value of the axion field, which might be induced either by CEDMs or by UV-originated PQ breaking other than the QCD anomaly, for instance the PQ breaking by quantum gravity effects. We find that in case with the PQ mechanism the nucleon EDMs have a similar pattern regardless of what is the dominant source of EDMs among the CEDMs and θ-term, unless there is a significant cancellation between the contributions from different sources. In contrast, some nuclei or atomic EDMs can have characteristic patterns significantly depending on the dominant source of EDMs, which may allow identifying the dominant source among the CEDMs and θ-term. Yet, discriminating the gluon CEDM from the QCD θ-parameter necessitates additional knowledge of low energy parameters induced by the gluon CEDM, which is not available at the moment. Our results imply that EDMs can reveal unambiguous sign of CEDMs while identifying the origin of the axion vacuum value, however it requires further knowledge of low energy parameters induced by the gluon CEDM.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.54

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.96 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.20 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v3). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In some models of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM), one of the leading low energy consequences of the model appears in the form of the chromo-electric dipole moments (CEDMs) of the gluons and light quarks. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 hedged possibility 0.73
We examine if these CEDMs can be distinguished from the QCD $\theta$-term through the experimentally measurable nuclear and atomic electric dipole moments (EDMs) in both cases with and without the Peccei-Quinn (PQ) mechanism solving the strong CP problem. contribution 0.98 0.61 0.04 hedged possibility 0.44
We find that the nucleon EDMs show a distinctive pattern when the EDMs are dominantly induced by the light quark CEDMs without the PQ mechanism. result 1.00 0.95 0.16 asserted 1.00
In the presence of the PQ mechanism, the QCD $\theta$-parameter corresponds to the vacuum value of the axion field, which might be induced either by CEDMs or by UV-originated PQ breaking other than the QCD anomaly, for instance the PQ breaking by quantum gravity effects. background 0.96 0.08 0.05 speculative 0.60
We find that in case with the PQ mechanism the nucleon EDMs have a similar pattern regardless of what is the dominant source of EDMs among the CEDMs and $\theta$-term, unless there is a significant cancellation between the contributions from different sources. result 1.00 0.94 0.17 asserted 1.00
In contrast, some nuclei or atomic EDMs can have characteristic patterns significantly depending on the dominant source of EDMs, which may allow identifying the dominant source among the CEDMs and $\theta$-term. result 0.95 0.82 0.23 hedged possibility 0.92
Yet, discriminating the gluon CEDM from the QCD $\theta$-parameter necessitates additional knowledge of low energy parameters induced by the gluon CEDM, which is not available at the moment. limitation 0.96 0.28 0.14 asserted 0.98
Our results imply that EDMs can reveal unambiguous sign of CEDMs while identifying the origin of the axion vacuum value, however it requires further knowledge of low energy parameters induced by the gluon CEDM. interpretation 0.99 0.81 0.81 asserted 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.51

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v3

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,710 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 64 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
Uses data or values from 10 papers
  • Finally, the gluon CEDM (Weinberg operator) contribution to $g̅_1$ was computed with QCD sum rules and chiral perturbation theory in [ref] as g̅_1 (w) ≃⟨0| L_w | π^0 ⟩(σ_πN/f_π^2 m_π^2+ 5 g_A^2 m_π/64πf_π^4 )≃±(2.6±1.5) ×10^-3 w GeV^2, at the matching scale $μ= 1$ GeV, where $L_w = 1/3 w f^abc G_α^a μ G_μ^bδ G_δ^cα$ is the Weinberg operator, and $g_A=1.27$.

    Contribution of the Weinberg-type Operator to atomic and nuclear electric dipole moments · CPV pion-nucleon couplings $g̅_0$ and $g̅_1$ · 0.97

  • Using the result of [ref] , we get g̅_0 (d̃_q) ≃ m_0^2/8f_π[δ_g_0 d δm_N/d m̅ ϵ(d̃_u+d̃_d) -(1-ϵ^2)δm_N/ϵ∑_q=u,d,sd̃_q/m_q] ≃-0.004(5) K_2 GeV^2, g̅_1 (d̃_q) ≃ δ_g_1 1/2f_π(d̃_u-d̃_d) m_0^2/2 σ_πN/m̅ = -0.095(31) K_2 GeV^2 , at the matching scale $μ= 1$ GeV, where we assumed the relation $d̃_q= m_q K_2$ for the final expression.

    Uncovering an Axion Mechanism with the EDM Portfolio · CPV pion-nucleon couplings $g̅_0$ and $g̅_1$ · 0.91

  • The theoretical uncertainty of the above result is about 50% which originates mostly from $M/μ_IR$ which is taken to be $√(2) ≤M/μ_IR ≤2√(2)$ in [ref] .

    Sum rules for CP-violating operators of Weinberg type · Nucleon EDMs · 0.86

Cites as background 22 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment