REVIEW 2 cited by
Do Multilingual Language Models Think Better in English?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Translate-test is a popular technique to improve the performance of multilingual language models. This approach works by translating the input into English using an external machine translation system, and running inference over the translated input. However, these improvements can be attributed to the use of a separate translation system, which is typically trained on large amounts of parallel data not seen by the language model. In this work, we introduce a new approach called self-translate, which overcomes the need of an external translation system by leveraging the few-shot translation capabilities of multilingual language models. Experiments over 5 tasks show that self-translate consistently outperforms direct inference, demonstrating that language models are unable to leverage their full multilingual potential when prompted in non-English languages. Our code is available at https://github.com/juletx/self-translate.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Emergence of Abstract Thought in Large Language Models Beyond Any Language
Across 20 open LLMs, shared multilingual neurons grow in number and per-neuron importance over release generations, which the authors interpret as evidence of language-agnostic abstract thought and use to guide neuron...
-
Text2Cypher Across Languages: Evaluating and Finetuning LLMs
A new multilingual Text2Cypher benchmark shows LLMs rank English highest, Spanish next, and Turkish lowest, and multilingual finetuning narrows the language gap more than English-only finetuning.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.