Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.10443 v1 pith:SWEPARST submitted 2023-08-21 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CY

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords llmschallengesexercisesmodelsunderstandcapture-the-flagcybersecurityfive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The assessment of cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag (CTF) exercises involves participants finding text strings or ``flags'' by exploiting system vulnerabilities. Large Language Models (LLMs) are natural-language models trained on vast amounts of words to understand and generate text; they can perform well on many CTF challenges. Such LLMs are freely available to students. In the context of CTF exercises in the classroom, this raises concerns about academic integrity. Educators must understand LLMs' capabilities to modify their teaching to accommodate generative AI assistance. This research investigates the effectiveness of LLMs, particularly in the realm of CTF challenges and questions. Here we evaluate three popular LLMs, OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing. First, we assess the LLMs' question-answering performance on five Cisco certifications with varying difficulty levels. Next, we qualitatively study the LLMs' abilities in solving CTF challenges to understand their limitations. We report on the experience of using the LLMs for seven test cases in all five types of CTF challenges. In addition, we demonstrate how jailbreak prompts can bypass and break LLMs' ethical safeguards. The paper concludes by discussing LLM's impact on CTF exercises and its implications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Measuring and Augmenting Large Language Models for Solving Capture-the-Flag Challenges

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A benchmark and agent for CTF solving, but the agent's retrieval database appears to contain the answers to the test challenges, undermining the reported improvements.

  2. Improving LLM Agents with Reinforcement Learning on Cryptographic CTF Challenges

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tool-augmented 8B LLM fine-tuned with GRPO on a new procedurally generated crypto CTF dataset reaches 0.88 Pass@8 on unseen easy tasks, up from 0.10 in the body's tables.

Pith tools