REVIEW 5 cited by
VIGC: Visual Instruction Generation and Correction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
VIGC: Visual Instruction Generation and Correction
read the original abstract
The integration of visual encoders and large language models (LLMs) has driven recent progress in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, the scarcity of high-quality instruction-tuning data for vision-language tasks remains a challenge. The current leading paradigm, such as LLaVA, relies on language-only GPT-4 to generate data, which requires pre-annotated image captions and detection bounding boxes, suffering from understanding image details. A practical solution to this problem would be to utilize the available multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to generate instruction data for vision-language tasks. However, it's worth noting that the currently accessible MLLMs are not as powerful as their LLM counterparts, as they tend to produce inadequate responses and generate false information. As a solution for addressing the current issue, this paper proposes the Visual Instruction Generation and Correction (VIGC) framework that enables multimodal large language models to generate instruction-tuning data and progressively enhance its quality on-the-fly. Specifically, Visual Instruction Generation (VIG) guides the vision-language model to generate diverse instruction-tuning data. To ensure generation quality, Visual Instruction Correction (VIC) adopts an iterative update mechanism to correct any inaccuracies in data produced by VIG, effectively reducing the risk of hallucination. Leveraging the diverse, high-quality data generated by VIGC, we finetune mainstream models and validate data quality based on various evaluations. Experimental results demonstrate that VIGC not only compensates for the shortcomings of language-only data generation methods, but also effectively enhances the benchmark performance. The models, datasets, and code are available at https://opendatalab.github.io/VIGC.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Models
HallusionBench shows GPT-4V reaches only 31.42% accuracy on paired questions testing language hallucination and visual illusion in LVLMs, with other models below 16%.
-
Beyond Hallucinations: Enhancing LVLMs through Hallucination-Aware Direct Preference Optimization
HA-DPO reframes hallucination reduction in LVLMs as direct preference optimization over style-consistent positive and negative response pairs, yielding large gains such as 35-point POPE accuracy jumps on MiniGPT-4.
-
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.
-
MobileVLM V2: Faster and Stronger Baseline for Vision Language Model
MobileVLM V2 shows that 1.7B and 3B parameter vision-language models can reach or exceed the performance of 3B and 7B+ models on common VLM benchmarks via targeted design and data improvements.
-
A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
This survey reviews the definition, symptoms, evaluation benchmarks, root causes, and mitigation methods for hallucinations in large vision-language models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.