Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An investigation into the impact of deep learning model choice on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.13415 v1 pith:NDCGNBVB submitted 2023-08-25 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

An investigation into the impact of deep learning model choice on sex and race bias in cardiac MR segmentation

classification eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG
keywords modelsbiasmodelchoicesegmentationai-basedcardiachowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In medical imaging, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used to automate routine tasks. However, these algorithms can exhibit and exacerbate biases which lead to disparate performances between protected groups. We investigate the impact of model choice on how imbalances in subject sex and race in training datasets affect AI-based cine cardiac magnetic resonance image segmentation. We evaluate three convolutional neural network-based models and one vision transformer model. We find significant sex bias in three of the four models and racial bias in all of the models. However, the severity and nature of the bias varies between the models, highlighting the importance of model choice when attempting to train fair AI-based segmentation models for medical imaging tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.