RECORD
Fusing Monocular Images and Sparse IMU Signals for Real-time Human Motion Capture
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 1 Sep 2023
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Either RGB images or inertial signals have been used for the task of motion capture (mocap), but combining them together is a new and interesting topic. We believe that the combination is complementary and able to solve the inherent difficulties of using one modality input, including occlusions, extreme lighting/texture, and out-of-view for visual mocap and global drifts for inertial mocap. To this end, we propose a method that fuses monocular images and sparse IMUs for real-time human motion capture. Our method contains a dual coordinate strategy to fully explore the IMU signals with different goals in motion capture. To be specific, besides one branch transforming the IMU signals to the camera coordinate system to combine with the image information, there is another branch to learn from the IMU signals in the body root coordinate system to better estimate body poses. Furthermore, a hidden state feedback mechanism is proposed for both two branches to compensate for their own drawbacks in extreme input cases. Thus our method can easily switch between the two kinds of signals or combine them in different cases to achieve a robust mocap. %The two divided parts can help each other for better mocap results under different conditions. Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation. Our codes are available for research at https://shaohua-pan.github.io/robustcap-page/.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Either RGB images or inertial signals have been used for the task of motion capture (mocap), but combining them together is a new and interesting topic. | background 0.87 | 0.05 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s1 | We believe that the combination is complementary and able to solve the inherent difficulties of using one modality input, including occlusions, extreme lighting/texture, and out-of-view for visual mocap and global drifts for inertial mocap. | background 0.71 | 0.11 | 0.08 | hedged possibility 0.47 |
| s2 | To this end, we propose a method that fuses monocular images and sparse IMUs for real-time human motion capture. | contribution 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.06 | asserted 0.97 |
| s3 | Our method contains a dual coordinate strategy to fully explore the IMU signals with different goals in motion capture. | method 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s4 | To be specific, besides one branch transforming the IMU signals to the camera coordinate system to combine with the image information, there is another branch to learn from the IMU signals in the body root coordinate system to better estimate body poses. | method 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s5 | Furthermore, a hidden state feedback mechanism is proposed for both two branches to compensate for their own drawbacks in extreme input cases. | method 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s6 | Thus our method can easily switch between the two kinds of signals or combine them in different cases to achieve a robust mocap. %The two divided parts can help each other for better mocap results under different conditions. | method 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.11 | asserted 0.85 |
| s7 | Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation. | result 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.89 | asserted 1.00 |
| s8 | Our codes are available for research at https://shaohua-pan.github.io/robustcap-page/. | contribution 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.02 | asserted 0.94 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Either RGB images or inertial signals have been used for the task of motion capture (mocap), but combining them together is a new and interesting topic. We believe that the combination is complementary and able to solve the inherent difficulties of using one modality input, including occlusions, extreme lighting/texture, and out-of-view for visual mocap and global drifts for inertial mocap. To this end, we propose a method that fuses monocular images and sparse IMUs for real-time human motion capture. Our method contains a dual coordinate strategy to fully explore the IMU signals with different goals in motion capture. To be specific, besides one branch transforming the IMU signals to the camera coordinate system to combine with the image information, there is another branch to learn from the IMU signals in the body root coordinate system to better estimate body poses. Furthermore, a hidden state feedback mechanism is proposed for both two branches to compensate for their own drawbacks in extreme input cases. Thus our method can easily switch between the two kinds of signals or combine them in different cases to achieve a robust mocap. %The two divided parts can help each other for better mocap results under different conditions. Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation. Our codes are available for research at https://shaohua-pan.github.io/robustcap-page/.
Human review
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
The other category of methods [ref] uses six 3DOF IMUs (inertial measurement units) worn on the user's head, forearms, pelvis, and lower legs respectively for HMT.
HMD-Poser: On-Device Real-time Human Motion Tracking from Scalable Sparse Observations · Introduction · 0.96
-
To address the ongoing difficulties in achieving precise joint angle and position estimations, researchers have reconsidered the use of external [ref] or body-worn [ref] cameras for visual-inertial tracking.
Transformer IMU Calibrator: Dynamic On-body IMU Calibration for Inertial Motion Capture · Inertial Motion Capture · 0.84
What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
We then reproject the 2D keypoints, detected by MediaPipe [ref] , onto the $Z$ = 1 plane using camera intrinsics to generalize to various camera settings.
MediaPipe: A Framework for Building Perception Pipelines · Local Pose Estimation · 1.00
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
We use the AIST++ dataset [ref] and the AMASS dataset [ref] for training.
AI Choreographer: Music Conditioned 3D Dance Generation with AIST++ · Implementation Details · 1.00
Compares with 1 paper
-
We perform the comparisons with the state-of-the-art vision-based methods ROMP [ref] , PARE [ref] , IMU-based methods TIP [ref] , PIP [ref] and combined method HybridCap [ref] , VIP [ref] .
HybridCap: Inertia-aid Monocular Capture of Challenging Human Motions · Comparisons · 1.00
Cites as support 1 paper
-
The translation estimation differs from pose estimation because pure inertial-based methods suffer from large drifts due to accumulated errors, as demonstrated in [ref] .
EgoLocate: Real-time Motion Capture, Localization, and Mapping with Sparse Body-mounted Sensors · Global Translation Estimation · 0.99
Cites as background 2 papers
-
Depending on the type of visual input, the vision-inertia fusion methods can be divided into three categories: fusing multi-view video with IMUs [ref] , fusing monocular RGBD video with IMUs [ref] , and fusing monocular RGB video with IMUs [ref] .
HybridCap: Inertia-aid Monocular Capture of Challenging Human Motions · Vision-inertia Fusion Methods · 0.99
-
Other works [ref] also focus on solving occlusions, and they design unique mechanisms, such as a deep generative motion infiller or a hypothetical bird's eye view.
Occluded Human Body Capture with Self-Supervised Spatial-Temporal Motion Prior · Vision-based Mocap Methods · 0.95
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.