Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Fusing Monocular Images and Sparse IMU Signals for Real-time Human Motion Capture

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 1 Sep 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2309.00310 (version 1)
Pith IDLLOKZ6EC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFeng Xu, Jijunnan Li, Qi Ma, Shaohua Pan, Weifeng Hu, Xingkang Zhou, Xinyu Yi, Xiong Wang. "Fusing Monocular Images and Sparse IMU Signals for Real-time Human Motion Capture." arXiv:2309.00310 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/LLOKZ6EC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,028 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.30 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.42 · controlled comparison 0.59 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.98.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Either RGB images or inertial signals have been used for the task of motion capture (mocap), but combining them together is a new and interesting topic. We believe that the combination is complementary and able to solve the inherent difficulties of using one modality input, including occlusions, extreme lighting/texture, and out-of-view for visual mocap and global drifts for inertial mocap. To this end, we propose a method that fuses monocular images and sparse IMUs for real-time human motion capture. Our method contains a dual coordinate strategy to fully explore the IMU signals with different goals in motion capture. To be specific, besides one branch transforming the IMU signals to the camera coordinate system to combine with the image information, there is another branch to learn from the IMU signals in the body root coordinate system to better estimate body poses. Furthermore, a hidden state feedback mechanism is proposed for both two branches to compensate for their own drawbacks in extreme input cases. Thus our method can easily switch between the two kinds of signals or combine them in different cases to achieve a robust mocap. %The two divided parts can help each other for better mocap results under different conditions. Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation. Our codes are available for research at https://shaohua-pan.github.io/robustcap-page/.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Either RGB images or inertial signals have been used for the task of motion capture (mocap), but combining them together is a new and interesting topic. background 0.87 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.99
s1 We believe that the combination is complementary and able to solve the inherent difficulties of using one modality input, including occlusions, extreme lighting/texture, and out-of-view for visual mocap and global drifts for inertial mocap. background 0.71 0.11 0.08 hedged possibility 0.47
s2 To this end, we propose a method that fuses monocular images and sparse IMUs for real-time human motion capture. contribution 0.99 0.85 0.06 asserted 0.97
s3 Our method contains a dual coordinate strategy to fully explore the IMU signals with different goals in motion capture. method 0.69 0.87 0.03 asserted 0.99
s4 To be specific, besides one branch transforming the IMU signals to the camera coordinate system to combine with the image information, there is another branch to learn from the IMU signals in the body root coordinate system to better estimate body poses. method 0.99 0.90 0.03 asserted 0.99
s5 Furthermore, a hidden state feedback mechanism is proposed for both two branches to compensate for their own drawbacks in extreme input cases. method 0.85 0.90 0.03 asserted 0.99
s6 Thus our method can easily switch between the two kinds of signals or combine them in different cases to achieve a robust mocap. %The two divided parts can help each other for better mocap results under different conditions. method 0.72 0.67 0.11 asserted 0.85
s7 Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation. result 1.00 0.96 0.89 asserted 1.00
s8 Our codes are available for research at https://shaohua-pan.github.io/robustcap-page/. contribution 0.51 0.52 0.02 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Either RGB images or inertial signals have been used for the task of motion capture (mocap), but combining them together is a new and interesting topic. We believe that the combination is complementary and able to solve the inherent difficulties of using one modality input, including occlusions, extreme lighting/texture, and out-of-view for visual mocap and global drifts for inertial mocap. To this end, we propose a method that fuses monocular images and sparse IMUs for real-time human motion capture. Our method contains a dual coordinate strategy to fully explore the IMU signals with different goals in motion capture. To be specific, besides one branch transforming the IMU signals to the camera coordinate system to combine with the image information, there is another branch to learn from the IMU signals in the body root coordinate system to better estimate body poses. Furthermore, a hidden state feedback mechanism is proposed for both two branches to compensate for their own drawbacks in extreme input cases. Thus our method can easily switch between the two kinds of signals or combine them in different cases to achieve a robust mocap. %The two divided parts can help each other for better mocap results under different conditions. Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrate that by delicately designing the fusion method, our technique significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art vision, IMU, and combined methods on both global orientation and local pose estimation. Our codes are available for research at https://shaohua-pan.github.io/robustcap-page/.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.